Category Archives: Standards

Introduction

This column provides an overview of the last Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG) plenary meeting, which took place from 12 to 16 December 2022. Around 100 participants from 21 different countries around the world registered for the meeting that was organized online by Brightcove (United Kingdom). During the five days, there were more than 40 presentations and discussions among researchers working on topics related to the projects ongoing within VQEG. All the related information, minutes, and files from the meeting are available online on the VQEG meeting website, and video recordings of the meeting are available on Youtube.

Many of the works presented in this meeting can be relevant for the SIGMM community working on quality assessment. Particularly interesting can be the proposals to update and merge ITU-T recommendations P.913, P.911, and P.910, the kick-off of the test plan to evaluate the QoE of immersive interactive communication systems, and the creation of a new group on emerging technologies that will start working on AI-based technologies and greening of streaming and related trends.

We encourage readers interested in any of the activities going on in the working groups to check their websites and subscribe to the corresponding reflectors, to follow them and get involved.

Overview of VQEG Projects

Audiovisual HD (AVHD)

The AVHD group investigates improved subjective and objective methods for analysing commonly available video systems. Currently, there are two projects ongoing under this group: Quality of Experience (QoE) Metrics for Live Video Streaming Applications (Live QoE) and Advanced Subjective Methods (AVHD-SUB).

In this meeting, there were three presentations related to topics covered by this group. In the first one, Maria Martini (Kingston University, UK), presented her work on converting video quality assessment metrics. In particular, the work addressed the relationship between SSIM and PSNR for DCT-based compressed images and video, exploiting the content-related factor [1]. The second presentation was given by Urvashi Pal (Akamai, Australia) and dealt with video codec profiling with video quality assessment complexities and resolutions. Finally, Jingwen Zhu (Nantes Université, France) presented her work on the benefit of parameter-driven approaches for the modelling and the prediction of a Satisfied User Ratio for compressed videos [2].

Quality Assessment for Health applications (QAH)

The QAH group works on the quality assessment of health applications, considering both subjective evaluation and the development of datasets, objective metrics, and task-based approaches. Currently there is an open discussion on new topics to address within the group, such as the application of visual attention models and studies to health applications. Also, an opportunity to conduct medical perception research was announced, which was proposed by Elizabeth Krupinski and will take place in the European Congress of Radiology (Vienna, Austria, Mar. 2023).

In addition, four research works were presented at the meeting. Firstly, Julie Fournier (INSA Rennes, France) presented new insights on affinity therapy for people with ASD, based on an eye-tracking study on images. The second presentation was delivered by Lumi Xia (INSA Rennes, France) and dealt with the evaluation of the usability of deep learning-based denoising models for low-dose CT simulation. Also, Mohamed Amine Kerkouri (University of Orleans, France), presented his work on deep-based quality assessment of medical images through domain adaptation. Finally, Jorge Caviedes (ASU, USA) delivered a talk on cognition inspired diagnostic image quality models, emphasising the need of distinguishing among interpretability (e.g., medical professional is confident in making a diagnosis), adequacy (e.g., capture technique shows the right area for assessment), and visual quality (e.g., MOS) in quality assessment of medical contents.

Statistical Analysis Methods (SAM)

The SAM group works on improving analysis methods both for the results of subjective experiments and for objective quality models and metrics. The group is currently working on updating and merging the ITU-T recommendations P.913, P.911, and P.910. The suggestion is to make P.910 and P.911 obsolete and make P.913 the only recommendation from ITU-T on subjective video quality assessments. The group worked on the liaison and document to be sent to ITU-T SG12 and will be available in the meeting files.

In addition, Mohsen Jenadeleh (Univerity of Konstanz, Germany) presented his work on collective just noticeable difference assessment for compressed video with Flicker Test and QUEST+.

Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)

CGI group is devoted to analysing and evaluating computer-generated content, with a focus on gaming in particular. The group is currently working in collaboration with ITU-T SG12 on the work item P.BBQCG on Parametric bitstream-based Quality Assessment of Cloud Gaming Services. In this sense, Saman Zadtootaghaj (Sony Interactive Entertainment, Germany) provided an update on the ongoing activities. In addition, they are working on two new work items: G.OMMOG on Opinion Model for Mobile Online Gaming applications and P.CROWDG on Subjective Evaluation of Gaming Quality with a Crowdsourcing Approach. Also, the group is working on identifying other topics and interests in CGI rather than gaming content.

No Reference Metrics (NORM)

The NORM group is an open collaborative project for developing no-reference metrics for monitoring visual service quality. Currently, the group is working on three topics: the development of no-reference metrics, the clarification of the computation of the Spatial and Temporal Indexes (SI and TI, defined in the ITU-T Recommendation P.910), and the development of a standard for video quality metadata. 

In relation to the first topic, Margaret Pinson (NTIA/ITS, US), talked about why no-reference metrics for image and video quality lack accuracy and reproducibility [3] and presented new datasets containing camera noise and compression artifacts for the development of no-reference metrics by the group. In addition, Oliver Wiedeman (University of Konstanz, Germany) presented his work on cross-resolution image quality assessment.

Regarding the computation of complexity indices, Maria Martini (Kingston University, UK) presented a study comparing 12 metrics (and possible combinations) for assessing video content complexity. Vignesh V. Menon (University of Klagenfurt, Austria) presented a summary of live per-title encoding approaches using video complexity features. Ioannis Katsavounidis and Cosmin Stejerean (Meta, US) presented their work on using motion search to order videos by coding complexity, also making available the software in open source. In addition, they led a discussion on supplementing classic SI and TI with improved complexity metrics (VCA, motion search, etc.).

Finally, related to the third topic, Ioannis Katsavounidis (Meta, US) provided an update on the status of the project. Given that the idea is already mature enough, a contribution will be made to MPEG to consider the insertion of metadata of video metrics into the encoded video streams. In addition, a liaison with AOMedia will be established that may go beyond this particular topic. And include best practices on subjective testing, IMG topics, etc.

Joint Effort Group (JEG) – Hybrid

The JEG group was focused on a joint work to develop hybrid perceptual/bitstream metrics and gradually evolved over time to include several areas of Video Quality Assessment (VQA), such as the creation of a large dataset for training such models using full-reference metrics instead of subjective metrics. Currently, the group is working on research problems rather than algorithms and models with immediate applicability. In addition, the group has launched a new website, which includes a list of activities of interest, freely available publications, and other resources. 

Two examples of research problems addressed by the group were shown by the two presentations given by Lohic Fotio Tiotsop (Politecnico di Torino, Italy). The topic of the first presentation was related to the training of artificial intelligence observers for a wide range of applications, while the second presentation provided guidelines to train, validate, and publish DNN-based objective measures.

5G Key Performance Indicators (5GKPI)

The 5GKPI group studies the relationship between key performance indicators of new 5G networks and QoE of video services on top of them. In this meeting, Pablo Pérez (Nokia XR Lab, Spain) presented an overview of activities related to QoE and XR within 3GPP.

Immersive Media Group (IMG)

The IMG group is focused on the research on quality assessment of immersive media. The main joint activity going on within the group is the development of a test plan to evaluate the QoE of immersive interactive communication systems. After the discussions that took place in previous meetings and audio calls, a tentative schedule has been proposed to start the execution of the test plan in the following months. In this sense, a new work item will be proposed in the next ITU-T SG12 meeting to establish a collaboration between VQEG-IMG and ITU on this topic.

In addition to this, a variety of different topics related to immersive media technologies were covered in the works presented during the meeting. For example, Yaosi Hu (Wuhan University, China) presented her work on video quality assessment based on quality aggregation networks. In relation to light field imaging, Maria Martini (Kingston University, UK) exposed the main problems related to what light field quality assessment datasets are currently meeting and presented a new dataset. Also, there were three talks by researchers from CWI (Netherlands) dealing with point cloud QoE assessment: Silvia Rossi presented a behavioral analysis in a 6-DoF VR system, taking into account the influence of content, quality and user disposition [4]; Shishir Subramanyam presented his work related to the subjective QoE evaluation of user-centered adaptive streaming of dynamic point clouds [5]; and Irene Viola presented a point cloud objective quality assessment using PCA-based descriptors (PointPCA). Another presentation related to point cloud quality assessment was delivered by Marouane Tliba (Université d’Orleans, France), who presented an efficient deep-based graph objective metric. 

In addition, Shirin Rafiei (RISE, Sweden) gave a talk on UX and QoE aspects of remote control operations using a laboratory platform, Marta Orduna (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain) presented her work on comparing ACR, SSDQE, and SSCQE in long duration 360-degree videos, whose results will be used to submit a proposal to extend ITU-T Rec. P.919 for long sequences, and Ali Ak (Nantes Université, France) his work on just noticeable differences to HDR/SDR image/video quality.    

Quality Assessment for Computer Vision Applications (QACoViA)

The goal of the QACoViA group is to study the visual quality requirements for computer vision methods, where the “final observer” is an algorithm. Four presentations were delivered in this meeting addressing diverse related topics. In the first one, Mikołaj Leszczuk (AGH University, Poland) presented a method for assessing objective video quality for automatic license plate recognition tasks [6]. Also, Femi Adeyemi-Ejeye (University of Surrey, UK) presented his work related to the assessment of rail 8K-UHD CCTV facing video for the investigation of collisions. The third presentation dealt with the application of facial expression recognition and was delivered by Lucie Lévêque (Nantes Université, France), who compared the robustness of humans and deep neural networks on this task [7]. Finally, Alban Marie (INSA Rennes, France) presented a study video coding for machines through a large-scale evaluation of DNNs robustness to compression artefacts for semantic segmentation [8].

Other updates

In relation to the Human Factors for Visual Experiences (HFVE) group, Maria Martini (Kingston University, UK) provided a summary of the status of IEEE recommended practice for the quality assessment of light field imaging. Also, Kjell Brunnström (RISE, Sweden) presented a study related to the perceptual quality of video on simulated low temperatures in LCD vehicle displays.

In addition, a new group was created in this meeting called Emerging Technologies Group (ETG), whose main objective is to address various aspects of multimedia that do not fall under the scope of any of the existing VQEG groups. The topics addressed are not necessarily directly related to “video quality” but can indirectly impact the work addressed as part of VQEG. In particular, two major topics of interest were currently identified: AI-based technologies and greening of streaming and related trends. Nevertheless, the group aims to provide a common platform for people to gather together and discuss new emerging topics, discuss possible collaborations in the form of joint survey papers/whitepapers, funding proposals, etc.

Moreover, it was agreed during the meeting to make the Psycho-Physiological Quality Assessment (PsyPhyQA) group dormant until interest resumes in this effort. Also, it was proposed to move the Implementer’s Guide for Video Quality Metrics (IGVQM) project into the JEG-Hybrid, since their activities are currently closely related. This will be discussed in future group meetings and the final decisions will be announced. Finally, as a reminder, the VQEG GitHub with tools and subjective labs setup is still online and kept updated.

The next VQEG plenary meeting will take place in May 2023 and the location will be announced soon on the VQEG website.

References

[1] Maria G. Martini, “On the relationship between SSIM and PSNR for DCT-based compressed images and video: SSIM as content-aware PSNR”, TechRxiv. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21725390.v1, 2022.
[2] J. Zhu, P. Le Callet; A. Perrin, S. Sethuraman, K. Rahul, “On The Benefit of Parameter-Driven Approaches for the Modeling and the Prediction of Satisfied User Ratio for Compressed Video”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Oct. 2022.
[3] Margaret H. Pinson, “Why No Reference Metrics for Image and Video Quality Lack Accuracy and Reproducibility”, Frontiers in Signal Processing, Jul. 2022.
[4] S. Rossi, I. viola, P. Cesar, “Behavioural Analysis in a 6-DoF VR System: Influence of Content, Quality and User Disposition”, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Interactive eXtended Reality, Oct. 2022.
[5] S. Subramanyam, I. Viola, J. Jansen, E. Alexiou, A. Hanjalic, P. Cesar, “Subjective QoE Evaluation of User-Centered Adaptive Streaming of Dynamic Point Clouds”, International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), Sep. 2022.
[6] M. Leszczuk, L. Janowski, J. Nawała, and A. Boev, “Method for Assessing Objective Video Quality for Automatic License Plate Recognition Tasks”, Communications in Computer and Information Science, Oct. 2022.
[7] L. Lévêque, F. Villoteau, E. V. B. Sampaio, M. Perreira Da Silva, and P. Le Callet, “Comparing the Robustness of Humans and Deep Neural Networks on Facial Expression Recognition”, Electronics, 11(23), Dec. 2022.
[8] A. Marie, K. Desnos, L. Morin, and Lu Zhang, “Video Coding for Machines: Large-Scale Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks Robustness to Compression Artifacts for Semantic Segmentation”, IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Sep. 2022.

After several years of online meetings, the 140th MPEG meeting was held as a face-to-face meeting in Mainz, Germany, and the official press release can be found here and comprises the following items:

• MPEG evaluates the Call for Proposals on Video Coding for Machines
• MPEG evaluates Call for Evidence on Video Coding for Machines Feature Coding
• MPEG reaches the First Milestone for Haptics Coding
• MPEG completes a New Standard for Video Decoding Interface for Immersive Media
• MPEG completes Development of Conformance and Reference Software for Compression of Neural Networks
• MPEG White Papers: (i) MPEG-H 3D Audio, (ii) MPEG-I Scene Description

Video Coding for Machines

Video coding is the process of compression and decompression of digital video content with the primary purpose of consumption by humans (e.g., watching a movie or video telephony). Recently, however, massive video data is more and more analyzed without human intervention leading to a new paradigm referred to as Video Coding for Machines (VCM) which targets both (i) conventional video coding and (ii) feature coding (see here for further details).

At the 140th MPEG meeting, MPEG Technical Requirements (WG 2) evaluated the responses to the Call for Proposals (CfP) for technologies and solutions enabling efficient video coding for machine vision tasks. A total of 17 responses to this CfP were received, with responses providing various technologies such as (i) learning-based video codecs, (ii) block-based video codecs, (iii) hybrid solutions combining (i) and (ii), and (iv) novel video coding architectures. Several proposals use a region of interest-based approach, where different areas of the frames are coded in varying qualities.

The responses to the CfP reported an improvement in compression efficiency of up to 57% on object tracking, up to 45% on instance segmentation, and up to 39% on object detection, respectively, in terms of bit rate reduction for equivalent task performance. Notably, all requirements defined by WG 2 were addressed by various proposals.

Furthermore, MPEG Technical Requirements (WG 2) evaluated the responses to the Call for Evidence (CfE) for technologies and solutions enabling efficient feature coding for machine vision tasks. A total of eight responses to this CfE were received, of which six responses were considered valid based on the conditions described in the call:

• For the tested video dataset increases in compression efficiency of up to 87% compared to the video anchor and over 90% compared to the feature anchor were reported.
• For the tested image dataset, the compression efficiency can be increased by over 90% compared to both image and feature anchors.

Research aspects: the main research area is still the same as described in my last column, i.e., compression efficiency (incl. probably runtime, sometimes called complexity) and Quality of Experience (QoE). Additional research aspects are related to the actual task for which video coding for machines is used (e.g., segmentation, object detection, as mentioned above).

Video Decoding Interface for Immersive Media

One of the most distinctive features of immersive media compared to 2D media is that only a tiny portion of the content is presented to the user. Such a portion is interactively selected at the time of consumption. For example, a user may not see the same point cloud object’s front and back sides simultaneously. Thus, for efficiency reasons and depending on the users’ viewpoint, only the front or back sides need to be delivered, decoded, and presented. Similarly, parts of the scene behind the observer may not need to be accessed.

At the 140th MPEG meeting, MPEG Systems (WG 3) reached the final milestone of the Video Decoding Interface for Immersive Media (VDI) standard (ISO/IEC 23090-13) by promoting the text to Final Draft International Standard (FDIS). The standard defines the basic framework and specific implementation of this framework for various video coding standards, including support for application programming interface (API) standards that are widely used in practice, e.g., Vulkan by Khronos.

The VDI standard allows for dynamic adaptation of video bitstreams to provide the decoded output pictures so that the number of actual video decoders can be smaller than the number of elementary video streams to be decoded. In other cases, virtual instances of video decoders can be associated with the portions of elementary streams required to be decoded. With this standard, the resource requirements of a platform running multiple virtual video decoder instances can be further optimized by considering the specific decoded video regions to be presented to the users rather than considering only the number of video elementary streams in use. The first edition of the VDI standard includes support for the following video coding standards: High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), Versatile Video Coding (VVC), and Essential Video Coding (EVC).

Research aspect: VDI is also a promising standard to enable the implementation of viewport adaptive tile-based 360-degree video streaming, but its performance still needs to be assessed in various scenarios. However, requesting and decoding individual tiles within a 360-degree video streaming application is a prerequisite for enabling efficiency in such cases, and VDI provides the basis for its implementation.

MPEG-DASH Updates

Finally, I’d like to provide a quick update regarding MPEG-DASH, which seems to be in maintenance mode. As mentioned in my last blog post, amendments, Defects under Investigation (DuI), and Technologies under Consideration (TuC) are output documents, as well as a new working draft called Redundant encoding and packaging for segmented live media (REAP), which eventually will become ISO/IEC 23009-9. The scope of REAP is to define media formats for redundant encoding and packaging of live segmented media, media ingest, and asset storage. The current working draft can be downloaded here.

Research aspects: REAP defines a distributed system and, thus, all research aspects related to such systems apply here, e.g., performance and scalability, just to name a few.

The 141st MPEG meeting will be online from January 16-20, 2023. Click here for more information about MPEG meetings and their developments.

JPEG initiates specification on fake media based on responses to its call for proposals

The 97^th JPEG meeting was held online from 24 to 28 October 2022. JPEG received responses to the Call for Proposals (CfP) on JPEG Fake Media, the first multimedia international standard designed to facilitate the secure and reliable annotation of media assets creation and modifications. In total six responses were received addressing different requirements in the scope of this standardization initiative. Moreover, relevant advances were made on the standardization of learning-based coding, notably the learning-based coding of images, JPEG AI, and JPEG Pleno point cloud coding. Furthermore, the explorations on quality assessment of images, JPEG AIC, and of JPEG Pleno light field had relevant advances with the definition of their Calls for Contributions and Common Test Conditions.

Also relevant, the 98th JPEG meeting will be held in Sydney, Australia, representing a return to physical meetings after the long COVID pandemics. This is a return, as the last physical meeting was also held in January 2020 in the same location, in Sydney, Australia.

The 97^th JPEG meeting had the following highlights:

• JPEG Fake Media responses to the Call for Proposals analysed,
• JPEG AI Verification Model,
• JPEG Pleno Learning-based Point Cloud coding Verification Model,
• JPEG Pleno Light Field issues a Call for Contributions on Subjective Light Field Quality Assessment,
• JPEG AIC issues a Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment,
• JPEG DNA releases a draft of Common Test Conditions,
• JPEG XS prepares third edition of core coding system, and profiles and buffer models,
• JPEG 2000 conformance is under development.

The following summarises the major achievements of the 97^th JPEG meeting.

JPEG Fake Media

In April 2022, the JPEG Committee released a Final Call for Proposals on JPEG Fake Media. The scope of JPEG Fake Media is the creation of a standard that can facilitate the secure and reliable annotation of media assets creation and modifications. The standard shall address use cases that are in good faith as well as those with malicious intent. During the 97th meeting in October 2022, the following six responses to the call were presented:

1. Adobe/C2PA: C2PA Specification
2. Huawei: Provenance and Right Management for Digital Contents in JPEG Fake Media
3. Sony Group Corporation: Methods to keep track provenance of media asset and signing data
4. Vrije Universiteit Brussel/imec: Media revision history tracking via asset decomposition and serialization
5. UPC: MIPAMS Provenance module
6. Newcastle University: Response to JPEG Fake Media standardization call

In the coming months, these proposals will be thoroughly evaluated following a process that is open, transparent, fair and unbiased and allows deep technical discussions to assess which proposals best address identified requirements. Based on the conclusions of these discussions, a new standard will be produced to address fake media and provide solutions for transparency related to media authenticity. The standard will combine the best elements of the six proposals.

To stay informed about the activities please join the JPEG Fake Media & NFT AHG mailing list and regularly check the JPEG website for the latest information.

JPEG AI

JPEG AI (ISO/IEC 6048) aims at the development of a learning-based image coding standard offering a single-stream, compact compressed domain representation, targeting both human visualization with significant compression efficiency improvement over state-of-the-art image coding standards at similar subjective quality, and improved performance for image processing and computer vision tasks. The evaluation of the Call for Proposals responses had already confirmed the industry interest, and the subjective tests presented at the 96th JPEG meeting showed results that significantly outperform conventional image compression solutions. 

The JPEG AI verification model has been issued as the outcome of this meeting and follows the integration effort of several neural networks and tools. There are several characteristics that make the JPEG AI Verification Model (VM) unique, such as the decoupling of the entropy decoding from the sample reconstruction and the exploitation of the spatial correlation between latents using a prediction and a fusion network as well as a massively parallelized auto-regressive network. The performance evaluation has shown significant RD performance improvements (as much as 32.2% of BD-rate over H.266/VVC) with competitive decoding complexity. Other functionalities such as rate adaptation and device interoperability have also been addressed with the use of gain units and the quantization of the weights in the entropy decoding module. Moreover, the adoption process for architectural changes and for new or improved coding tools in JPEG AI VM was approved. A set of core experiments have been defined for improving the JPEG AI VM and target the improvement of the coding efficiency and the reduction of the encoding and decoding complexity. The core experiments represent a set of promising technologies, such as learning-based GAN training, simplification of the analysis/synthesis transform, adaptive entropy coding alphabet, and even encoder-only tools and procedures for training speed-up.

JPEG Pleno Learning-based Point Cloud coding

The JPEG Pleno Point Cloud activity progressed at this meeting with the successful validation of the Verification Model under Consideration (VMuC). The VMuC was confirmed as the Verification Model (VM) to form the core of the future standard; ISO/IEC 21794 Part 6 JPEG Pleno: Learning-based Point Cloud Coding. The JPEG Committee has commenced work on the Working Draft of the standard, with initial text reviewed at this meeting. Prior to the next 98^th JPEG Meeting, JPEG experts will investigate possible advancements to the VM in the area of auto-regressive entropy encoding and sparse tensor convolution as well as sourcing additional point clouds for the JPEG Pleno Point Cloud test set.

JPEG Pleno Light Field

During the 97^th meeting, the JPEG Committee released the “JPEG Pleno Final Call for Contributions on Subjective Light Field Quality Assessment”, to collect new procedures and best practices regarding light field subjective quality evaluation methodologies to assess artifacts induced by coding algorithms. All contributions, including test procedures, datasets, and any additional information, will be considered to develop the standard by consensus among the JPEG experts following a collaborative process approach. The deadline for submission of contributions is April 1, 2023.

The JPEG Committee organized its 1^st workshop on light field quality assessment to discuss challenges and current solutions for subjective light field quality assessment, explore relevant use cases and requirements, and provide a forum for researchers to discuss the latest findings in this area. The JPEG Committee also promoted its 2^nd workshop on learning-based light field coding to exchange experiences and to present technological advances in learning-based coding solutions for light field data. The proceedings and video footage of both workshops are now accessible on the JPEG website.

JPEG AIC

At the 97^th JPEG Meeting, a new JPEG AIC Final Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment was issued. The JPEG Committee is working on the continuation of the previous standardization efforts (AIC-1 and AIC-2) and aims at developing a new standard, known as AIC-3. The new standard will be focusing on the methodologies for quality assessment of images in a range that goes from high quality to near-visually lossless quality, which are not covered by the previous AIC standards.

The Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment is asking for contributions to the standardization process that will be collaborative from the very beginning. In this context, all received contributions will be considered for the development of the standard by consensus among the JPEG experts.

The JPEG Committee will be releasing a new JPEG AIC-3 Dataset on the 15^th of December 2022. And the deadline for submitting contributions to the call is set to the 1^st of April 2023 23:59 UTC. The contributors will be presenting their contributions at the 99^th JPEG Meeting in April 2023.

The Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment addresses the development of a suitable subjective evaluation methodology standard. A second stage will address the objective perceptual visual quality evaluation models that perform well and have a good discriminative power in the high quality to near-visually lossless quality range.

JPEG DNA

The JPEG Committee has continued its exploration of the coding of images in quaternary representations, as it is particularly suitable for DNA storage applications. The scope of JPEG DNA is the creation of a standard for efficient coding of images that considers biochemical constraints and offers robustness to noise introduced by the different stages of the storage process that is based on DNA synthetic polymers. During the 97^th JPEG meeting, the JPEG DNA Benchmark Codec and the JPEG DNA Common Test Conditions were updated to allow for additional concrete experiments to take place prior to issuing a draft call for proposals at the next meeting. This will also allow further validation and extension of the JPEG DNA benchmark codec to simulate an end-to-end image storage pipeline using DNA and in particular include biochemical noise simulation which is an essential element in practical implementations.

JPEG XS

The 2^nd edition of JPEG XS is now fully completed and published. The JPEG Committee continues its work on the 3^rd edition of JPEG XS, starting with Part 1 (Core coding system) and Part 2 (Profiles and buffer models). These editions will address new use cases and requirements for JPEG XS by defining additional coding tools to further improve the coding efficiency, while keeping the low-latency and low-complexity core aspects of JPEG XS. The primary goal of the 3^rd edition is to deliver the same image quality as the 2^nd edition, but with half of the required bandwidth. During the 97^th JPEG meeting, a new Working Draft of Part 1 and a first Working Draft of Part 2 were created. To support the work a new Core Experiment was also issued to further test the proposed technology. Finally, an update to the JPEG XS White Paper has been published.

JPEG 2000

A new edition of Rec. ITU-T T.803 | ISO/IEC 15444-4 (JPEG 2000 conformance) is under development.

This new edition proposes to relax the maximum allowable errors so that well-designed 16-bit fixed-point implementations pass all compliance tests; adds two test codestreams to facilitate testing of inverse wavelet and component decorrelating transform accuracy, and adds several codestreams and files conforming to Rec. ITU-T 801 |ISO/IEC 15444-2 to facilitate the implementation of decoders and file format readers

Codestreams and test files can be found on the JPEG GitLab repository at: https://gitlab.com/wg1/htj2k-codestreams/-/merge_requests/14

Final Quote

“Motivated by the consumers’ concerns of manipulated contents, the JPEG Committee has taken concrete steps to define a new standard that provides interoperable solutions for a secure and reliable annotation of media assets creation and modifications” said Prof. Touradj Ebrahimi, the Convenor of the JPEG Committee.

Upcoming JPEG meetings are planned as follows:

• No 98, will be in Sydney, Australia from 14-20 January 2022

Introduction

Welcome to this new column on the ACM SIGMM Records from the Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG), which will provide an overview of the last VQEG plenary meeting that took place from 9 to 13 May 2022. It was organized by INSA Rennes (France), and it was the first face-to-face meeting after the series of online meetings due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Remote attendance was also offered, which made possible that around 100 participants, from 17 different countries, attended the meeting (more than 30 of them attended in person). During the meeting, more than 40 presentations were provided, and interesting discussion took place. All the related information, minutes, and files from the meeting are available online in the VQEG meeting website, and video recordings of the meeting are available in Youtube.

Many of the works presented at this meeting can be relevant for the SIGMM community working on quality assessment. Particularly interesting can be the proposals to update the ITU-T Recommendations P.910 and P.913, as well as the presented publicly available datasets. We encourage those readers interested in any of the activities going on in the working groups to check their websites and subscribe to the corresponding reflectors, to follow them and get involved.

Overview of VQEG Projects

Audiovisual HD (AVHD)

The AVHD group investigates improved subjective and objective methods for analyzing commonly available video systems. In this sense, the group continues working on extensions of the ITU-T Recommendation P.1204 to cover other encoders (e.g., AV1) apart from H.264, HEVC, and VP9. In addition, the project’s Quality of Experience (QoE) Metrics for Live Video Streaming Applications (Live QoE) and Advanced Subjective Methods (AVHD-SUB) are still ongoing. 

In this meeting, several AVHD-related topics were discussed, supported by six different presentations. In the first one, Mikolaj Leszczuk (AGH University, Poland) presented an analysis of the influence on the subjective assessment of the quality of video transmission of experiment conditions, such as video sequence order, variation and repeatability that can entail a “learning” process of the test participants during the test. In the second presentation, Lucjan Janowski (AGH University, Poland) presented two proposals towards more ecologically valid experiment designs: the first one using the Absolute Category Rating [1] without scale but in a “think aloud” manner, and the second one called “Your Youtube, our lab” in which the user selects the content that he or she prefers and a question quality appears during the viewing experience through a specifically designed interface. Also dealing with the study of testing methodologies, Babak Naderi (TU-Berlin, Germany) presented work on subjective evaluation of video quality with a crowdsourcing approach, while Pierre David (Capacités, France) presented a three-lab experiment, involving Capacités (France), RISE (Sweden) and AGH University (Poland) on quality evaluation of social media videos. Kjell Brunnström (RISE, Sweden) continued by giving an overview of video quality assessment of Video Assistant Refereeing (VAR) systems, and lastly, Olof Lindman (SVT, Sweden) presented another effort to reduce the lack of open datasets with the Swedish Television (SVT) Open Content.

Quality Assessment for Health applications (QAH)

The QAH group works on the quality assessment of health applications, considering both subjective evaluation and the development of datasets, objective metrics, and task-based approaches. In this meeting, Lucie Lévêque (Nantes Université, France) provided an overview of the recent activities of the group, including a submitted review paper on objective quality assessment for medical images, a special session accepted for IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) that will take place in October in Bordeaux (France), and a paper submitted to IEEE ICIP on quality assessment through detection task of covid-19 pneumonia. The work described in this paper was also presented by Meriem Outtas (INSA Rennes, France).

In addition, there were two more presentations related to the quality assessment of medical images. Firstly, Yuhao Sun (University of Edinburgh, UK) presented their research on a no-reference image quality metric for visual distortions on Computed Tomography (CT) scans [2]. Finally, Marouane Tliba (Université d’Orleans, France) presented his studies on quality assessment of medical images through deep-learning techniques using domain adaptation.

Statistical Analysis Methods (SAM)

The SAM group works on improving analysis methods both for the results of subjective experiments and for objective quality models and metrics. The group is currently working on a proposal to update the ITU-T Recommendation P.913, including new testing methods for subjective quality assessment and statistical analysis of the results. Margaret Pinson presented this work during the meeting.   

In addition, five presentations were delivered addressing topics related to the group activities. Jakub Nawała (AGH University, Poland) presented the Generalised Score Distribution to accurately describe responses from subjective quality experiments. Three presentations were provided by members of Nantes Université (France): Ali Ak presented his work on spammer detection on pairwise comparison experiments, Andreas Pastor talked about how to improve the maximum likelihood difference scaling method in order to measure the inter-content scale, and Chama El Majeny presented the functionalities of a subjective test analysis tool, whose code will be publicly available. Finally, Dietmar Saupe (Univerity of Konstanz, Germany) delivered a presentation on subjective image quality assessment with boosted triplet comparisons.

Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)

CGI group is devoted to analyzing and evaluating computer-generated content, with a focus on gaming in particular. Currently, the group is working on the ITU-T Work Item P.BBQCG on Parametric bitstream-based Quality Assessment of Cloud Gaming Services. Apart from this, Jerry (Xiangxu) Yu (University of Texas at Austin, US) presented a work on subjective and objective quality assessment of user-generated gaming videos and Nasim Jamshidi (TUB, Germany) presented a deep-learning bitstream-based video quality model for CG content.

No Reference Metrics (NORM)

The NORM group is an open collaborative project for developing no-reference metrics for monitoring visual service quality. Currently, the group is working on three topics: the development of no-reference metrics, the clarification of the computation of the Spatial and Temporal Indexes (SI and TI, defined in the ITU-T Recommendation P.910), and on the development of a standard for video quality metadata.  

At this meeting, this was one of the most active groups and the corresponding sessions included several presentations and discussions. Firstly, Yiannis Andreopoulos (iSIZE, UK) presented their work on domain-specific fusion of multiple objective quality metrics. Then, Werner Robitza (AVEQ GmbH/TU Ilmenau, Germany) presented the updates on SI/TI clarification activities, which is leading an update of the ITU-T Recommendation P.910. In addition, Lukas Krasula (Netflix, US) presented their investigations on the relation between banding annoyance and the overall quality perceived by the viewers. Hadi Amirpour (University of Klagenfurt, Austria) delivered two presentations related to their Video Complexity Analyzer and their Video Complexity Dataset, which are both publicly available. Finally, Mikołaj Leszczuk (AGH University , Poland) gave two talks on their research related to User-Generated Content (UGC) (a.k.a. in-the-wild video content) recognition and on advanced video quality indicators to characterise video content.   

Joint Effort Group (JEG) – Hybrid

The JEG group was focused on joint work to develop hybrid perceptual/bitstream metrics and gradually evolved over time to include several areas of Video Quality Assessment (VQA), such as the creation of a large dataset for training such models using full-reference metrics instead of subjective metrics. A report on the ongoing activities of the group was presented by Enrico Masala (Politecnico di Torino, Italy), which included the release of a new website to reflect the evolution that happened in the last few years within the group. Although currently the group is not directly seeking the development of new metrics or tools readily available for VQA, it is still working on related topics such as the studies by Lohic Fotio Tiotsop (Politecnico di Torino, Italy) on the sensitivity of artificial intelligence-based observers to input signal modification.

5G Key Performance Indicators (5GKPI)

The 5GKPI group studies the relationship between key performance indicators of new 5G networks and QoE of video services on top of them. In this meeting, Pablo Pérez (Nokia, Spain) presented an extended report on the group activities, from which it is worth noting the joint work on a contribution to the ITU-T Work Item G.QoE-5G. 

Immersive Media Group (IMG)

The IMG group is focused on the research on the quality assessment of immersive media. Currently, the main joint activity of the group is the development of a test plan for evaluating the QoE of immersive interactive communication systems. In this sense, Pablo Pérez (Nokia, Spain) and Jesús Gutiérrez (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain) presented a follow up on this test plan including an overview of the state-of-the-art on related works and a taxonomy classifying the existing systems [3]. This test plan is closely related to the work carried out by the ITU-T on QoE Assessment of eXtended Reality Meetings, so Gunilla Berndtsson (Ericsson, Sweden) presented the latest advances on the development of the P.QXM.  

Apart from this, there were four presentations related to the quality assessment of immersive media. Shirin Rafiei (RISE, Sweden) presented a study on QoE assessment of an augmented remote operating system for scaling in smart mining applications. Zhengyu Zhang (INSA Rennes, France) gave a talk on a no-reference quality metric for light field images based on deep-learning and exploiting angular and spatial information. Ali Ak (Nantes Université, France) presented a study on the effect of temporal sub-sampling on the accuracy of the quality assessment of volumetric video. Finally, Waqas Ellahi (Nantes Université, France) showed their research on a machine-learning framework to predict Tone-Mapping Operator (TMO) preference based on image and visual attention features [4].

Quality Assessment for Computer Vision Applications (QACoViA)

The goal of the QACoViA group is to study the visual quality requirements for computer vision methods. In this meeting, there were three presentations related to this topic. Mikołaj Leszczuk (AGH University, Poland) presented an objective video quality assessment method for face recognition tasks. Also, Alban Marie  (INSA Rennes, France) showed an analysis of the correlation of quality metrics with artificial intelligence accuracy. Finally, Lucie Lévêque (Nantes Université, France) gave an overview of a study on the reliability of existing algorithms for facial expression recognition [5]. 

Intersector Rapporteur Group on Audiovisual Quality Assessment (IRG-AVQA)

The IRG-AVQA group studies topics related to video and audiovisual quality assessment (both subjective and objective) among ITU-R Study Group 6 and ITU-T Study Group 12. In this sense, Chulhee Lee (Yonsei University, South Korea) and Alexander Raake (TU Ilmenau, Germany) provided an overview on ongoing activities related to quality assessment within ITU-R and ITU-T.

Other updates

In addition, the Human Factors for Visual Experiences (HFVE), whose objective is to uphold the liaison relation between VQEG and the IEEE standardization group P3333.1, presented their advances in relation to two standards: IEEE P3333.1.3 – Deep-Learning-based assessment of VE based on HF, which has been approved and published, and the IEEE P3333.1.4 on Light field imaging, which has been submitted and is in the process to be approved. Also, although there were not many activities in this meeting within the Implementer’s Guide for Video Quality Metrics (IGVQM) and the Psycho-Physiological Quality Assessment (PsyPhyQA) they are still active. Finally, as a reminder, the VQEG GitHub with tools and subjective labs setup is still online and kept updated.

The next VQEG plenary meeting will take place online in December 2022. Please, see VQEG Meeting information page for more information.

References

[1] ITU, “Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications”, ITU-T Recommendation P.910, Jul. 2022.
[2] Y. Sun, G. Mogos, “Impact of Visual Distortion on Medical Images”, IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 1:49, Mar. 2022.
[3] P. Pérez, E. González-sosa, J. Gutiérrez, N. García, “Emerging Immersive Communication Systems: Overview, Taxonomy, and Good Practices for QoE Assessment”, Frontiers in Signal Processing, Jul. 2022.
[4] W. Ellahi, T. Vigier, P. Le Callet, “A machine-learning framework to predict TMO preference based on image and visual attention features”, International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Oct. 2021.
[5] E. M. Barbosa Sampaio, L. Lévêque, P. Le Callet, M. Perreira Da Silva, “Are facial expression recognition algorithms reliable in the context of interactive media? A new metric to analyse their performance”, ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, Jun. 2022.

JPEG analyses the responses of the Calls for Proposals for the standardisation of the first codecs based on machine learning

The 96^th JPEG meeting was held online from 25 to 29 July 2022. The meeting was one of the most productive in the recent history of JPEG with the analysis of the responses of two Calls for Proposals (CfP) for machine learning-based coding solutions, notably JPEG AI and JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding. The superior performance of the CfP responses compared to the state-of-the-art anchors leave little doubt about the future of coding technologies becoming dominated by machine learning-based solutions with the expected consequences on the standardisation pathway. A new era of multimedia coding standardisation has begun. Both activities had defined a verification model, and are pursuing a collaborative process that will select the best technologies for the definition of the new machine learning-based standards.

The 96^th JPEG meeting had the following highlights:

• JPEG AI response to the Call for Proposals;
• JPEG Pleno Point Cloud begins the collaborative standardisation phase;
• JPEG Fake Media and NFT
• JPEG Systems
• JPEG Pleno Light Field
• JPEG AIC
• JPEG XS
• JPEG 2000
• JPEG DNA

The following summarises the major achievements of the 96^th JPEG meeting.

JPEG AI

The 96th JPEG meeting represents an important milestone for the JPEG AI standardisation as it marks the beginning of the collaborative phase of this project. The main JPEG AI objective is to design a solution that offers significant compression efficiency improvement over coding standards in common use at equivalent subjective quality and an effective compressed domain processing for machine learning-based image processing and computer vision tasks. 

During the 96th JPEG meeting, several activities occurred, notably presentation of the eleven responses to all tracks of the Call for Proposals (CfP). Furthermore, discussions on the evaluation process used to assess submissions to the CfP took place, namely, subjective, objective and complexity assessment as well as the identification of device interoperability issues by cross-checking. For the standard reconstruction track, several contributions showed significantly higher compression efficiency in both subjective quality methodologies and objective metrics when compared to the best-performing conventional image coding.

From the analysis and discussion of the results obtained, the most promising technologies were identified and a new JPEG AI verification model under consideration (VMuC) was approved. The VMuC corresponds to a combination of two proponents’ solutions (following the ‘one tool for one functionality’ principle), selected by consensus and considering the CfP decision criteria and factors. In addition, a set of JPEG AI Core Experiments were defined to obtain further improvements in both performance efficiency and complexity, notably the use of learning-based GAN training, alternative analysis/synthesis transforms and an evaluation study for the compressed-domain denoising as an image processing task. Several further activities were also discussed and defined, such as the design of a compressed domain image classification decoder VMuC, the creation of a large screen content dataset for the training of learning-based image coding solutions and the definition of a new and larger JPEG AI test set.

JPEG Pleno Point Cloud begins collaborative standardisation phase

JPEG Pleno integrates various modalities of plenoptic content under a single framework in a seamless manner. Efficient and powerful point cloud representation is a key feature of this vision. A point cloud refers to data representing positions of points in space, expressed in a given three-dimensional coordinate system, the so-called geometry. This geometrical data can be accompanied by per-point attributes of varying nature (e.g. color or reflectance). Such datasets are usually acquired with a 3D scanner, LIDAR or created using 3D design software and can subsequently be used to represent and render 3D surfaces. Combined with other types of data (like light field data), point clouds open a wide range of new opportunities, notably for immersive browsing and virtual reality applications.

Learning-based solutions are the state of the art for several computer vision tasks, such as those requiring a high-level understanding of image semantics, e.g., image classification, face recognition and object segmentation, but also 3D processing tasks, e.g. visual enhancement and super-resolution. Recently, learning-based point cloud coding solutions have shown great promise to achieve competitive compression efficiency compared to available conventional point cloud coding solutions at equivalent subjective quality. Building on a history of successful and widely adopted coding standards, JPEG is well positioned to develop a standard for learning-based point cloud coding.

During its 94th meeting, the JPEG Committee released a Final Call for Proposals on JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding. This call addressed learning-based coding technologies for point cloud content and associated attributes with emphasis on both human visualization and decompressed/reconstructed domain 3D processing and computer vision with competitive compression efficiency compared to point cloud coding standards in common use, with the goal of supporting a royalty-free baseline. During its 96th meeting, the JPEG Committee evaluated 5 codecs submitted in response to this Call. Following a comprehensive evaluation process, the JPEG Committee selected one of the proposals to form the basis of a future standard and initialised a sub-division to form Part 6 of ISO/IEC 21794. The selected submission was a learning-based approach to point cloud coding that met the requirements of the Call and showed competitive performance, both in terms of coding geometry and color, against existing solutions.

JPEG Fake Media and NFT

At the 96th JPEG meeting, 6 pre-registrations to the Final Call for Proposals (CfP) on JPEG Fake Media were received. The scope of JPEG Fake Media is the creation of a standard that can facilitate the secure and reliable annotation of media asset creation and modifications. The standard shall address use cases that are in good faith as well as those with malicious intent. The CfP welcomes contributions that address at least one of the extensive list of requirements specified in the associated “Use Cases and Requirements for JPEG Fake Media” document. Proponents who have not yet made a pre-registration are still welcome to submit their final proposal before 19 October 2022. Full details about the timeline, submission requirements and evaluation processes are documented in the CfP available on jpeg.org.

In parallel with the work on Fake Media, JPEG explores use cases and requirements related to Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Although the use cases between both topics are different, there is a significant overlap in terms of requirements and relevant solutions. The presentations and video recordings of the joint 5th JPEG NFT and Fake Media Workshop that took place prior to the 96^th meeting are available on the JPEG website. In addition, a new version of the “Use Cases and Requirements for JPEG NFT” was produced and made publicly available for review and feedback.

JPEG Systems

During the 96th JPEG Meeting, the IS texts for both JLINK (ISO/IEC 19566-7) and JPEG Snack (ISO/IEC 19566-8) were prepared and submitted for final publication. JLINK specifies a format to store multiple images inside of JPEG files and supports interactive navigation between them. JLINK addresses use cases such as virtual museum tours, real estate visits, hotspot zoom into other images and many others. JPEG Snack on the other hand enables self-running multimedia experiences such as animated image sequences and moving image overlays. Both standards are based on the JPEG Universal Metadata Box Format (JUMBF, ISO/IEC 19566-5) for which a second edition is in progress. This second edition adds extensions to the native support of CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) and attaches private fields to the JUMBF Description Box.

JPEG Pleno Light Field

During its 96th meeting, the JPEG Committee released the “JPEG Pleno Second Draft Call for Contributions on Light Field Subjective Quality Assessment”, to collect new procedures and best practices for light field subjective quality evaluation methodologies to assess artefacts induced by coding algorithms. All contributions, which can be test procedures, datasets, and any additional information, will be considered to develop the standard by consensus among JPEG experts following a collaborative process approach. The Final Call for Contributions will be issued at the 97th JPEG meeting. The deadline for submission of contributions is 1 April 2023.

A JPEG Pleno Light Field AhG has also started the preparation of a first workshop on Subjective Light Field Quality Assessment and a second workshop on Learning-based Light field Coding, to exchange experiences, to present technological advances and research results on light field subjective quality assessment and to present technological advances and research results on learning-based coding solutions for light field data, respectively.

JPEG AIC

During its 96th meeting, a Second Draft Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment was issued. The final Call for Contributions is now planned to be issued at the 97^th JPEG meeting. The standardization process will be collaborative from the very beginning, i.e. all submissions will be considered in developing the next extension of the JPEG AIC standard. The deadline for submissions has been extended to 1 April 2023 at 23:59 UTC. Multiple types of contributions are accepted, namely subjective assessment methods including supporting evidence and detailed description, test material, interchange format, software implementation, criteria and protocols for evaluation, additional relevant use cases and requirements, and any relevant evidence or literature. A dataset of sample images with compression-based distortions in the target quality range is planned to be prepared for the 97^th JPEG meeting.

JPEG XS

With the 2nd edition of JPEG XS now in place, the JPEG Committee continues with the development of the 3rd edition of JPEG XS Part 1 (Core coding system) and Part 2 (Profiles and buffer models). These editions will address new use cases and requirements for JPEG XS by defining additional coding tools to further improve the coding efficiency, while keeping the low-latency and low-complexity core aspects of JPEG XS. The primary goal of the 3rd edition is to deliver the same image quality as the 2nd edition, but for specific content such as screen content with half of the required bandwidth. In this respect, experiments have indicated that it is possible to increase the quality in static regions of an image sequence by more than 10dB when compared to the 2nd edition. Based on the input contributions, a first working draft for 21122-1 has been created, along with the necessary core experiments for further evaluation and verification.

In addition, JPEG has finalized the work on the amendment for Part 2 2nd edition that defines a new High 4:2:0 profile and the new sublevel Sublev4bpp. This amendment is now ready for publication by ISO. In the context of Part 4 (Conformance testing) and Part 5 (Reference software), the JPEG Committee decided to make both parts publicly available.

Finally, the JPEG Committee decided to create a series of public documents, called the “JPEG XS in-depth series” that will explain various features and applications of JPEG XS to a broad audience. The first document in this series explains the advantages of using JPEG XS for raw image compression and will be published soon on jpeg.org.

JPEG 2000

The JPEG Committee published a case study that compares HT2K, ProRes and JPEG 2000 Part 1 when processing motion picture content with widely available commercial software tools running on notebook computers, available at https://ds.jpeg.org/documents/jpeg2000/wg1n100269-096-COM-JPEG_Case_Study_HTJ2K_performance_on_laptop_desktop_PCs.pdf

JPEG 2000 is widely used in the media and entertainment industry for Digital Cinema distribution, studio video masters and broadcast contribution links. High Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K or JPEG 2000 Part 15) is an update to JPEG 2000 that provides an order of magnitude speed up over legacy JPEG 2000 Part 1.

JPEG DNA

The JPEG Committee has continued its exploration of the coding of images in quaternary representations, as it is particularly suitable for DNA storage applications. The scope of JPEG DNA is the creation of a standard for efficient coding of images that considers biochemical constraints and offers robustness to noise introduced by the different stages of the storage process that is based on DNA synthetic polymers. During the 96th JPEG meeting, a new version of the overview document on Use Cases and Requirements for DNA-based Media Storage was issued and has been made publicly available. The JPEG Committee also updated two additional documents: the JPEG DNA Benchmark Codec and the JPEG DNA Common Test Conditions in order to allow for concrete exploration experiments to take place. This will allow further validation and extension of the JPEG DNA benchmark codec to simulate an end-to-end image storage pipeline using DNA and in particular, include biochemical noise simulation which is an essential element in practical implementations. A new branch has been created in the JPEG Gitlab that now contains two anchors and two JPEG DNA benchmark codecs.

Final Quote

“After successful calls for contributions, the JPEG Committee sets precedence by launching the collaborative phase of two learning based visual information coding standards, hence announcing the start of a new era in coding technologies relying on AI.” said Prof. Touradj Ebrahimi, the Convenor of the JPEG Committee.

Upcoming JPEG meetings are planned as follows:

• No 97, will be held online from 24-28 October 2022.
• No 98, will be in Sydney, Australia from 14-20 January 2022

The original blog post can be found at the Bitmovin Techblog and has been modified/updated here to focus on and highlight research aspects.

The 139th MPEG meeting was once again held as an online meeting, and the official press release can be found here and comprises the following items:

• MPEG Issues Call for Evidence for Video Coding for Machines (VCM)
• MPEG Ratifies the Third Edition of Green Metadata, a Standard for Energy-Efficient Media Consumption
• MPEG Completes the Third Edition of the Common Media Application Format (CMAF) by adding Support for 8K and High Frame Rate for High Efficiency Video Coding
• MPEG Scene Descriptions adds Support for Immersive Media Codecs
• MPEG Starts New Amendment of VSEI containing Technology for Neural Network-based Post Filtering
• MPEG Starts New Edition of Video Coding-Independent Code Points Standard
• MPEG White Paper on the Third Edition of the Common Media Application Format

In this report, I’d like to focus on VCM, Green Metadata, CMAF, VSEI, and a brief update about DASH (as usual).

Video Coding for Machines (VCM)

MPEG’s exploration work on Video Coding for Machines (VCM) aims at compressing features for machine-performed tasks such as video object detection and event analysis. As neural networks increase in complexity, architectures such as collaborative intelligence, whereby a network is distributed across an edge device and the cloud, become advantageous. With the rise of newer network architectures being deployed amongst a heterogenous population of edge devices, such architectures bring flexibility to systems implementers. Due to such architectures, there is a need to efficiently compress intermediate feature information for transport over wide area networks (WANs). As feature information differs substantially from conventional image or video data, coding technologies and solutions for machine usage could differ from conventional human-viewing-oriented applications to achieve optimized performance. With the rise of machine learning technologies and machine vision applications, the amount of video and images consumed by machines has rapidly grown. Typical use cases include intelligent transportation, smart city technology, intelligent content management, etc., which incorporate machine vision tasks such as object detection, instance segmentation, and object tracking. Due to the large volume of video data, extracting and compressing the feature from a video is essential for efficient transmission and storage. Feature compression technology solicited in this Call for Evidence (CfE) can also be helpful in other regards, such as computational offloading and privacy protection.

Over the last three years, MPEG has investigated potential technologies for efficiently compressing feature data for machine vision tasks and established an evaluation mechanism that includes feature anchors, rate-distortion-based metrics, and evaluation pipelines. The evaluation framework of VCM depicted below comprises neural network tasks (typically informative) at both ends as well as VCM encoder and VCM decoder, respectively. The normative part of VCM typically includes the bitstream syntax which implicitly defines the decoder whereas other parts are usually left open for industry competition and research.

Further details about the CfP and how interested parties can respond can be found in the official press release here.

Research aspects: the main research area for coding-related standards is certainly compression efficiency (and probably runtime). However, this video coding standard will not target humans as video consumers but as machines. Thus, video quality and, in particular, Quality of Experience needs to be interpreted differently, which could be another worthwhile research dimension to be studied in the future.

Green Metadata

MPEG Systems has been working on Green Metadata for the last ten years to enable the adaptation of the client’s power consumption according to the complexity of the bitstream. Many modern implementations of video decoders can adjust their operating voltage or clock speed to adjust the power consumption level according to the required computational power. Thus, if the decoder implementation knows the variation in the complexity of the incoming bitstream, then the decoder can adjust its power consumption level to the complexity of the bitstream. This will allow less energy use in general and extended video playback for the battery-powered devices.

The third edition enables support for Versatile Video Coding (VVC, ISO/IEC 23090-3, a.k.a. ITU-T H.266) encoded bitstreams and enhances the capability of this standard for real-time communication applications and services. While finalizing the support of VVC, MPEG Systems has also started the development of a new amendment to the Green Metadata standard, adding the support of Essential Video Coding (EVC, ISO/IEC 23094-1) encoded bitstreams.

Research aspects: reducing global greenhouse gas emissions will certainly be a challenge for humanity in the upcoming years. The amount of data on today’s internet is dominated by video, which all consumes energy from production to consumption. Therefore, there is a strong need for explicit research efforts to make video streaming in all facets friendly to our environment. 

Third Edition of Common Media Application Format (CMAF)

The third edition of CMAF adds two new media profiles for High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC, ISO/IEC 23008-2, a.k.a. ITU-T H.265), namely for (i) 8K and (ii) High Frame Rate (HFR). Regarding the former, the media profile supporting 8K resolution video encoded with HEVC (Main 10 profile, Main Tier with 10 bits per colour component) has been added to the list of CMAF media profiles for HEVC. The profile will be branded as ‘c8k0’ and will support videos with up to 7680×4320 pixels (8K) and up to 60 frames per second. Regarding the latter, another media profile has been added to the list of CMAF media profiles, branded as ‘c8k1’ and supports HEVC encoded video with up to 8K resolution and up to 120 frames per second. Finally, chroma location indication support has been added to the 3rd edition of CMAF.

Research aspects: basically, CMAF serves two purposes: (i) harmonizing DASH and HLS at the segment format level by adopting the ISOBMFF and (ii) enabling low latency streaming applications by introducing chunks (that are smaller than segments). The third edition supports resolutions up to 8K and HFR, which raises the question of how low latency can be achieved for 8K/HFR applications and services and under which conditions.

New Amendment for Versatile Supplemental Enhancement Information (VSEI) containing Technology for Neural Network-based Post Filtering

At the 139th MPEG meeting, the MPEG Joint Video Experts Team with ITU-T SG 16 (WG 5; JVET) issued a Committee Draft Amendment (CDAM) text for the Versatile Supplemental Enhancement Information (VSEI) standard (ISO/IEC 23002-7, a.k.a. ITU-T H.274). Beyond the Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) message for shutter interval indication, which is already known from its specification in Advanced Video Coding (AVC, ISO/IEC 14496-10, a.k.a. ITU-T H.264) and High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC, ISO/IEC 23008-2, a.k.a. ITU-T H.265), and a new indicator for subsampling phase indication which is relevant for variable-resolution video streaming, this new amendment contains two SEI messages for describing and activating post filters using neural network technology in video bitstreams. This could reduce coding noise, upsampling, colour improvement, or denoising. The description of the neural network architecture itself is based on MPEG’s neural network coding standard (ISO/IEC 15938-17). Results from an exploration experiment have shown that neural network-based post filters can deliver better performance than conventional filtering methods. Processes for invoking these new post-processing filters have already been tested in a software framework and will be made available in an upcoming version of the Versatile Video Coding (VVC, ISO/IEC 23090-3, a.k.a. ITU-T H.266) reference software (ISO/IEC 23090-16, a.k.a. ITU-T H.266.2).

Research aspects: quality enhancements such as reducing coding noise, upsampling, colour improvement, or denoising have been researched quite substantially either with or without neural networks. Enabling such quality enhancements via (V)SEI messages enable system-level support for research and development efforts in this area. For example, integration in video streaming applications or/and conversational services, including performance evaluations.

The latest MPEG-DASH Update

Finally, I’d like to provide a brief update on MPEG-DASH! At the 139th MPEG meeting, MPEG Systems issued a new working draft related to Extended Dependent Random Access Point (EDRAP) streaming and other extensions, which will be further discussed during the Ad-hoc Group (AhG) period (please join the dash email list for further details/announcements). Furthermore, Defects under Investigation (DuI) and Technologies under Consideration (TuC) have been updated. Finally, a new part has been added (ISO/IEC 23009-9), which is called encoder and packager synchronization, for which also a working draft has been produced. Publicly available documents (if any) can be found here.

An updated overview of DASH standards/features can be found in the Figure below.

Research aspects: in the Christian Doppler Laboratory ATHENA we aim to research and develop novel paradigms, approaches, (prototype) tools and evaluation results for the phases (i) multimedia content provisioning (i.e., video coding), (ii) content delivery (i.e., video networking), and (iii) content consumption (i.e., video player incl. ABR and QoE) in the media delivery chain as well as for (iv) end-to-end aspects, with a focus on, but not being limited to, HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS). Recent DASH-related publications include “Low Latency Live Streaming Implementation in DASH and HLS” and “Segment Prefetching at the Edge for Adaptive Video Streaming” among others.

The 140th MPEG meeting will be face-to-face in Mainz, Germany, from October 24-28, 2022. Click here for more information about MPEG meetings and their developments.

JPEG issues a call for proposals for JPEG Fake Media

The 95^th JPEG meeting was held online from 25 to 29 April 2022. A Call for Proposals (CfP) was issued for JPEG Fake Media that aims at a standardisation framework for secure annotation of modifications in media assets. With this new initiative, JPEG endeavours to provide standardised means for the identification of the provenance of media assets that include imaging information. Assuring the provenance of the coded information is essential considering the current trends and possibilities on multimedia technology.

This new initiative complements the ongoing standardisation of machine learning based codecs for images and point clouds. Both are expected to revolutionise the state of the art of coding standards, leading to compression rates beyond the current state of the art.

The 95^th JPEG meeting had the following highlights:

• JPEG Fake Media issues a Call for Proposals;
• JPEG AI
• JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding;
• JPEG Pleno Light Fields quality assessment;
• JPEG AIC near perceptual lossless quality assessment;
• JPEG NFT exploration;
• JPEG DNA explorations
• JPEG XS 2nd edition published;
• JPEG XL 2nd edition.

The following summarises the major achievements of the 95^th JPEG meeting.

JPEG Fake Media

At its 95th JPEG meeting, the committee issued a Final Call for Proposals (CfP) on JPEG Fake Media. The scope of JPEG Fake Media is the creation of a standard that can facilitate the secure and reliable annotation of media asset creation and modifications. The standard shall address use cases that are in good faith as well as those with malicious intent. The call for proposals welcomes contributions that address at least one of the extensive list of requirements specified in the associated “Use Cases and Requirements for JPEG Fake Media” document. Proponents are highly encouraged to express their interest in submission of a proposal before 20 July 2022 and submit their final proposal before 19 October 2022. Full details about the timeline, submission requirements and evaluation processes are documented in the CfP available on jpeg.org.

JPEG AI

Following the JPEG AI joint ISO/IEC/ITU-T Call for Proposals issued after the 94th JPEG committee meeting, 14 registrations were received among which 12 codecs were submitted for the standard reconstruction task. For computer vision and image processing tasks, several teams have submitted compressed domain decoders, notably 6 for image classification. Prior to the 95th JPEG meeting, the work was focused on the management of the Call for Proposals submissions and the creation of the test sets and the generation of anchors for standard reconstruction, image processing and computer vision tasks. Moreover, a dry run of the subjective evaluation of the JPEG AI anchors was performed with expert subjects and the results were analysed during this meeting, followed by additions and corrections to the JPEG AI Common Training and Test Conditions and the definition of several recommendations for the evaluation of the proposals, notably, the anchors, images and bitrates selection. A procedure for cross-check evaluation was also discussed and approved. The work will now focus on the evaluation of the Call for Proposals submissions, which is expected to be finalized at the 96th JPEG meeting.

JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding

JPEG Pleno is working towards the integration of various modalities of plenoptic content under a single and seamless framework. Efficient and powerful point cloud representation is a key feature within this vision. Point cloud data supports a wide range of applications for human and machine consumption including metaverse, autonomous driving, computer-aided manufacturing, entertainment, cultural heritage preservation, scientific research and advanced sensing and analysis. During the 95th JPEG meeting, the JPEG Committee reviewed the responses to the Final Call for Proposals on JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding. Four responses have been received from three different institutions. At the upcoming 96th JPEG meeting, the responses to the Call for Proposals will be evaluated with a subjective quality evaluation and objective metric calculations.

JPEG Pleno Light Field

The JPEG Pleno standard tools provide a framework for coding new imaging modalities derived from representations inspired by the plenoptic function. The image modalities addressed by the current standardization activities are light field, holography, and point clouds, where these image modalities describe different sampled representations of the plenoptic function. Therefore, to properly assess the quality of these plenoptic modalities, specific subjective and objective quality assessment methods need to be designed.

In this context, JPEG has launched a new standardisation effort known as JPEG Pleno Quality Assessment. It aims at providing a quality assessment standard, defining a framework that includes subjective quality assessment protocols and objective quality assessment procedures for lossy decoded data of plenoptic modalities for multiple use cases and requirements. The first phase of this effort will address the light field modality.

To assist this task, JPEG has issued the “JPEG Pleno Draft Call for Contributions on Light Field Subjective Quality Assessment”, to collect new procedures and best practices with regard to light field subjective quality assessment methodologies to assess artefacts induced by coding algorithms. All contributions, which can be test procedures, datasets, and any additional information, will be considered to develop the standard by consensus among the JPEG experts following a collaborative process approach.

The Final Call for Contributions will be issued at the 96th JPEG meeting. The deadline for submission of contributions is 18 December 2022.

JPEG AIC

During the 95th JPEG Meeting, the committee released the Draft Call for Contributions on Subjective Image Quality Assessment.

The new JPEG AIC standard will be developed considering all the submissions to the Call for Contributions in a collaborative process. The deadline for the submission is set for 14 October 2022. Multiple types of contributions are accepted, notably subjective assessment methods including supporting evidence and detailed description, test material, interchange format, software implementation, criteria and protocols for evaluation, additional relevant use cases and requirements, and any relevant evidence or literature.

The JPEG AIC committee has also started the preparation of a workshop on subjective assessment methods for the investigated quality range, which will be held at the end of June. The workshop targets obtaining different views on the problem, and will include both internal and external speakers, as well as a Q&A panel. Experts in the field of quality assessment and stakeholders interested in the use cases are invited.

JPEG NFT

After the joint JPEG NFT and Fake Media workshops it became evident that even though the use cases between both topics are different, there is a significant overlap in terms of requirements and relevant solutions. For that reason, it was decided to create a single AHG that covers both JPEG NFT and JPEG Fake Media explorations. The newly established AHG JPEG Fake Media and NFT will use the JPEG Fake Media mailing list.

JPEG DNA

The JPEG Committee has continued its exploration of the coding of images in quaternary representations, as it is particularly suitable for DNA storage applications. The scope of JPEG DNA is the creation of a standard for efficient coding of images that considers biochemical constraints and offers robustness to noise introduced by the different stages of the storage process that is based on DNA synthetic polymers. A new version of the overview document on DNA-based Media Storage: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, Use Cases and Requirements was issued and has been made publicly available. It was decided to continue this exploration by validating and extending the JPEG DNA benchmark codec to simulate an end-to-end image storage pipeline using DNA for future exploration experiments including biochemical noise simulation. During the 95th JPEG meeting, a new specific document describing the Use Cases and Requirements for DNA-based Media Storage was created which is made publicly available. A timeline for the standardization process was also defined. Interested parties are invited to consider joining the effort by registering to the JPEG DNA AHG mailing list.

JPEG XS

The JPEG Committee is pleased to announce that the 2nd editions of Part 1 (Core coding system), Part 2 (Profiles and buffer models), and Part 3 (Transport and container formats) were published in March 2022. Furthermore, the committee finalized the work on Part 4 (Conformance testing) and Part 5 (Reference software), which are now entering the final phase for publication. With these last two parts, the committee’s work on the 2nd edition of the JPEG XS standards comes to an end, allowing to shift the focus to further improve the standard. Meanwhile, in response to the latest Use Cases and Requirements for JPEG XS v3.1, the committee received a number of technology proposals from Fraunhofer and intoPIX that focus on improving the compression performance for desktop content sequences. The proposals will now be evaluated and thoroughly tested and will form the foundation of the work towards a 3rd edition of the JPEG XS suite of standards. The primary goal of the 3rd edition is to deliver the same image quality as the 2nd edition, but with half of the required bandwidth.

JPEG XL

The second edition of JPEG XL Part 1 (Core coding system), with an improved numerical stability of the edge-preserving filter and numerous editorial improvements, has proceeded to the CD stage. Work on a second edition of Part 2 (File format) was initiated. Hardware coding was also further investigated. Preliminary software support has been implemented in major web browsers, image viewing and editing software, including popular tools such as FFmpeg, ImageMagick, libvips, GIMP, GDK and Qt. JPEG XL is now ready for wide-scale adoption.

Final Quote

“Recent development on creation and modification of visual information call for development of tools that can help protecting the authenticity and integrity of media assets. JPEG Fake Media is a standardised framework to deal with imaging provenance.” said Prof. Touradj Ebrahimi, the Convenor of the JPEG Committee.

Upcoming JPEG meetings are planned as follows:

• No. 96, will be held online during 25-29 July 2022.

Introduction

Welcome to a new column on the ACM SIGMM Records from the Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG).
The last VQEG plenary meeting took place from 13 to 17 December 2021, and it was organized online by University of Surrey, UK. During five days, more than 100 participants (from more than 20 different countries of America, Asia, Africa, and Europe) could remotely attend the multiple sessions related to the active VQEG projects, which included more than 35 presentations and interesting discussions. This column provides an overview of this VQEG plenary meeting, while all the information, minutes and files (including the presented slides) from the meeting are available online in the VQEG meeting website.

Many of the works presented in this meeting can be relevant for the SIGMM community working on quality assessment. Particularly interesting can be the new analyses and methodologies discussed within the Statistical Analyses Methods group, the new metrics and datasets presented within the No-Reference Metrics group, and the progress on the plans of the 5G Key Performance Indicators group and the Immersive Media group. We encourage those readers interested in any of the activities going on in the working groups to check their websites and subscribe to the corresponding reflectors, to follow them and get involved.

Overview of VQEG Projects

Audiovisual HD (AVHD)

The AVHD group investigates improved subjective and objective methods for analyzing commonly available video systems. In this sense, it has recently completed a joint project between VQEG and ITU SG12 in which 35 candidate objective quality models were submitted and evaluated through extensive validation tests. The result was the ITU-T Recommendation P.1204, which includes three standardized models: a bit-stream model, a reduced reference model, and a hybrid no-reference model. The group is currently considering extensions of this standard, which originally covered H.264, HEVC, and VP9, to include other encoders, such as AV1. Apart from this, two other projects are active under the scope of AVHD: QoE Metrics for Live Video Streaming Applications (Live QoE) and Advanced Subjective Methods (AVHD-SUB).

During the meeting, three presentations related to AVHD activities were provided. In the first one, Mikolaj Leszczuk (AGH University) presented their work on secure and reliable delivery of professional live transmissions with low latency, which brought to the floor the constant need for video datasets, such as the VideoSet. In addition, Andy Quested (ITU-R Working Party 6C) led a discussion on how to assess video quality for very high resolution (e.g., 8K, 16K, 32K, etc.) monitors with interactive applications, which raised the discussion on the key possibility of zooming in to absorb the details of the images without pixelation. Finally, Abhinau Kumar (UT Austin) and Cosmin Stejerean (Meta) presented their work on exploring the reduction of the complexity of VMAF by using features in the wavelet domain [1]. 

Quality Assessment for Health applications (QAH)

The QAH group works on the quality assessment of health applications, considering both subjective evaluation and the development of datasets, objective metrics, and task-based approaches. This group was recently launched and, for the moment, they have been working on a topical review paper on objective quality assessment of medical images and videos, which was submitted in December to Medical Image Analysis [2]. Rafael Rodrigues (Universidade da Beira Interior) and Lucie Lévêque (Nantes Université) presented the main details of this work in a presentation scheduled during the QAH session. The presentation also included information about the review paper published by some members of the group on methodologies for subjective quality assessment of medical images [3] and the efforts in gathering datasets to be listed on the VQEG datasets website. In addition, Lu Zhang (IETR – INSA Rennes) presented her work on model observers for the objective quality assessment of medical images from task-based approaches, considering three tasks: detection, localization, and characterization [4]. In addition, it is worth noting that members of this group are organizing a special session on “Quality Assessment for Medical Imaging” at the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) that will take place in Bordeaux (France) from the 16 to the 19 October 2022.

Statistical Analysis Methods (SAM)

The SAM group works on improving analysis methods both for the results of subjective experiments and for objective quality models and metrics. Currently, they are working on statistical analysis methods for subjective tests, which are discussed in their monthly meetings.

In this meeting, there were four presentations related to SAM activities. In the first one, Zhi Li and Lukáš Krasula (Netflix), exposed the lessons they learned from the subjective assessment test carried out during the development of their metric Contrast Aware Multiscale Banding Index (CAMBI) [5]. In particular, they found that some subjective can have perceptually unbalanced stimuli, which can cause systematic and random errors in the results. In this sense, they explained their statistical data analyses to mitigate these errors, such as the techniques in ITU-T Recommendation P.913 (section 12.6) which can reduce the effects of the random error. The second presentation described the work by Pablo Pérez (Nokia Bell Labs), Lucjan Janowsk (AGH University), Narciso Garcia (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), and Margaret H. Pinson (NTIA/ITS) on a novel subjective assessment methodology with few observers with repetitions (FOWR) [6]. Apart from the description of the methodology, the dataset generated from the experiments is available on the Consumer Digital Video Library (CDVL). Also, they launched a call for other labs to repeat their experiments, which will help on discovering the viability, scope and limitations of the FOWR method and, if appropriate, include this method in the ITU-T Recommendation P.913 for quasi-experimental assessments when it is not possible to have 16 to 24 subjects (e.g., pre-tests, expert assessment, and resource limitations), for example, performing the experiment with 4 subjects 4 times each on different days, which would be similar to a test with 15 subjects. In the third presentation, Irene Viola (CWI) and Lucjan Janowski (AGH University) presented their analyses on the standardized methods for subject removal in subjective tests. In particular, the methods proposed in the recommendations ITU-R BT.500 and ITU-T P.913 were considered, resulting in that the first one (described in Annex 1 of Part 1) is not recommended for Absolute Category Rating (ACR) tests, while the one described in the second recommendations provides good performance, although further investigation in the correlation threshold used to discard subjects s required. Finally, the last presentation led the discussion on the future activities of SAM group, where different possibilities were proposed, such as the analysis of confidence intervals for subjective tests, new methods for comparing subjective tests from more than two labs, how to extend these results to better understand the precision of objective metrics, and research on crowdsourcing experiment in order to make them more reliable and improve cost-effectiveness. These new activities are discussed in the monthly meetings of the group.

Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)

CGI group focuses on quality analysis of computer-generated imagery, with a focus on gaming in particular. Currently, the group is working on topics related to ITU work items, such as ITU-T Recommendation P.809 with the development of a questionnaire for interactive cloud gaming quality assessment, ITU-T Recommendation P.CROWDG related to quality assessment of gaming through crowdsourcing, ITU-T Recommendation P.BBQCG with a bit-stream based quality assessment of cloud gaming services, and a codec comparison for computer-generated content. In addition, a presentation was delivered during the meeting by Nabajeet Barman (Kingston University/Brightcove), who presented the subjective results related to the work presented at the last VQEG meeting on the use of LCEVC for Gaming Video Streaming Applications [7]. For more information on the related activities, do not hesitate to contact the chairs of the group. 

No Reference Metrics (NORM)

The NORM group is an open collaborative project for developing no-reference metrics for monitoring visual service quality. Currently, two main topics are being addressed by the group, which are discussed in regular online meetings. The first one is related to the improvement of SI/TI metrics to solve ambiguities that have appeared over time, with the objective of providing reference software and updating the ITU-T Recommendation P.910. The second item is related to the addition of standard metadata of video quality assessment-related information in the encoded video streams. 

In this meeting, this group was one of the most active in terms of presentations on related topics, with 11 presentations. Firstly, Lukáš Krasula (Netflix) presented their Contrast Aware Multiscale Banding Index (CAMBI) [5], an objective quality metric that addresses banding degradations that are not detected by other metrics, such as VMAF and PSNR (code is available on GitHub). Mikolaj Leszczuk (AGH University) presented their work on the detection of User-Generated Content (UGC) automatic detection in the wild. Also, Vignesh Menon & Hadi Amirpour (AAU Klagenfurt) presented their open-source project related to the analysis and online prediction of video complexity for streaming applications. Jing Li (Alibaba) presented their work related to the perceptual quality assessment of internet videos [8], proposing a new objective metric (STDAM, for the moment, used internally) validated in the Youku-V1K dataset. The next presentation was delivered by Margaret Pinson (NTIA/ITS) dealing with a comprehensive analysis on why no-reference metrics fail, which emphasized the need of training these metrics on several datasets and test them on larger ones. The discussion also pointed out the recommendation for researchers to publish their metrics in open source in order to make it easier to validate and improve them. Moreover, Balu Adsumilli and Yilin Wang (Youtube) presented a new no-reference metric for UGC, called YouVQ, based on a transfer-learning approach with a pre-train on non-UGC data and a re-train on UGC. This metric will be released in open-source shortly, and a dataset with videos and subjective scores has been also published. Also, Margaret Pinson (NTIA/ITS), Mikołaj Leszczuk (AGH University), Lukáš Krasula (Netflix), Nabajeet Barman (Kingston University/Brightcove), Maria Martini (Kingston University), and Jing Li (Alibaba) presented a collection of datasets for no-reference metric research, while Shahid Satti (Opticom GmbH) exposed their work on encoding complexity for short video sequences. On his side, Franz Götz-Hahn (Universität Konstanz/Universität Kassel) presented their work on the creation of the KonVid-150k video quality assessment dataset [9], which can be very valuable for training no-reference metrics, and the development of objective video quality metrics. Finally, regarding the aforementioned two active topics within NORM group, Ioannis Katsavounidis (Meta) provided a presentation on the advances in relation to the activity related to the inclusion of standard video quality metadata, while Lukáš Krasula (Netflix), Cosmin Stejerean (Meta), and Werner Robitza (AVEQ/TU Ilmenau) presented the updates on the improvement of SI/TI metrics for modern video systems.

Joint Effort Group (JEG) – Hybrid

The JEG group was focused on joint work to develop hybrid perceptual/bitstream metrics and on the creation of a large dataset for training such models using full-reference metrics instead of subjective metrics. In this sense, a project in collaboration with Sky was finished and presented in the last VQEG meeting.

Related activities were presented in this meeting. In particular, Enrico Masala and Lohic Fotio Tiotsop (Politecnico di Torino) presented the updates on the recent activities carried out by the group, and their work on artificial-intelligence observers for video quality evaluation [10].

Implementer’s Guide for Video Quality Metrics (IGVQM)

The IGVQM group, whose activity started in the VQEG meeting in December 2020, works on creating an implementer’s guide for video quality metrics. In this sense, the current goal is to create a report on the accuracy of video quality metrics following a test plan based on collecting datasets, collecting metrics and methods for assessment, and carrying out statistical analyses. An update on the advances was provided by Ioannis Katsavounidis (Meta) and a call for the community is open to contribute to this activity with datasets and metrics.

5G Key Performance Indicators (5GKPI)

The 5GKPI group studies relationship between key performance indicators of new communications networks (especially 5G) and QoE of video services on top of them. Currently, the group is working on the definition of relevant use cases, which are discussed on monthly audiocalls. 

In relation to these activities, there were four presentations during this meeting. Werner Robitza (AVQ/TU Ilmenau) presented a proposal for KPI message format for gaming QoE over 5G networks. Also, Pablo Pérez (Nokia Bell Labs) presented their work on a parametric quality model for teleoperated driving [11] and an update of the ITU-T GSTR-5GQoE topic, related to the QoE requirements for real-time multimedia services over 5G networks. Finally, Margaret Pinson (NTIA/ITS) presented an overall description of 5G technology, including differences in spectrum allocation per country impact on the propagation and responsiveness and throughput of 5G devices.

Immersive Media Group (IMG)

The IMG group researches on quality assessment of immersive media. The group recently finished the test plan for quality assessment of short 360-degree video sequences, which resulted in the support for the development of the ITU-T Recommendation P.919. Currently, the group is working on further analyses of the data gathered from the subjective tests carried out for that test plan and on the analysis of data for the quality assessment of long 360-degree videos. In addition, members of the group are contributing to the IUT-T SG12 on the topic G.CMVTQS on computational models for QoE/QoS monitoring to assess video telephony services. Finally, the group is also working on the preparation of a test plan for evaluating the QoE with immersive and interactive communication systems, which was presented by Pablo Pérez (Nokia Bell Labs) and Jesús Gutiérrez (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid). If the reader is interested in this topic, do not hesitate to contact them to join the effort. 

During the meeting, there were also four presentations covering topics related to the IMG topics. Firstly, Alexander Raake (TU Ilmenau) provided an overview of the projects within the AVT group dealing with the QoE assessment of immersive media. Also, Ashutosh Singla (TU Ilmenau) presented a 360-degree video database with higher-order ambisonics spatial audio. Maria Martini (Kingston University) presented an update on the IEEE standardization activities on Human Factors or Visual Experiences (HFVE), such as the recently submitted draft standard on deep-learning-based quality assessment and the draft standard to be submitted shortly on quality assessment of light field content. Finally, Kjell Brunnstöm (RISE) presented their work on legibility in virtual reality, also addressing the perception of speech-to-text by Deaf and hard of hearing.  

Intersector Rapporteur Group on Audiovisual Quality Assessment (IRG-AVQA) and Q19 Interim Meeting

Although in this case there was no official meeting IRG-AVQA meeting, there were various presentations related to ITU activities addressing QoE evaluation topics. In this sense, Chulhee Lee (Yonsei University) presented an overview of ITU-R activities, with a special focus on quality assessment of HDR content, and together with Alexander Raake (TU Ilmenau) presented an update on ongoing ITU-T activities.

Other updates

All the sessions of this meeting and, thus, the presentations, were recorded and have been uploaded to Youtube. Also, it is worth informing that the anonymous FTP will be closed soon, so files and presentations can be accessed from old browsers or via an FTP app. All the files, including those corresponding to the VQEG meetings, will be embedded into the VQEG website over the next months. In addition, the GitHub with tools and subjective labs setup is still online and kept updated. Moreover, during this meeting, it was decided to close the Joint Effort Group (JEG) and the Independent Lab Group (ILG), which can be re-established when needed. Finally, although there were not many activities in this meeting within the Quality Assessment for Computer Vision Applications (QACoViA) and the Psycho-Physiological Quality Assessment (PsyPhyQA) they are still active.

The next VQEG plenary meeting will take place in Rennes (France) from 9 to 13 May 2022, which will be again face-to-face after four online meetings.

References

[1] A. K. Venkataramanan, C. Stejerean, A. C. Bovik, “FUNQUE: Fusion of Unified Quality Evaluators”, arXiv:2202.11241, submitted to the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2022. (opens in a new tab).
[2] R. Rodrigues, L. Lévêque, J. Gutiérrez, H. Jebbari, M. Outtas, L. Zhang, A. Chetouani, S. Al-Juboori, M. G. Martini, A. M. G. Pinheiro, “Objective Quality Assessment of Medical Images and Videos: Review and Challenges”, submitted to the Medical Image Analysis, 2022.
[3] L. Lévêque, M. Outtas, L. Zhang, H. Liu, “Comparative study of the methodologies used for subjective medical image quality assessment”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 66, no. 15, Jul. 2021. (opens in a new tab).
[4] L.Zhang, C.Cavaro-Ménard, P.Le Callet, “An overview of model observers”, Innovation and Research in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 214-224, Sep. 2014. (opens in a new tab).
[5] P. Tandon, M. Afonso, J. Sole, L. Krasula, “Comparative study of the methodologies used for subjective medical image quality assessment”, Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), Jul. 2021. (opens in a new tab).
[6] P. Pérez, L. Janowski, N. García, M. Pinson, “Subjective Assessment Experiments That Recruit Few Observers With Repetitions (FOWR)”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (Early Access), Jul. 2021. (opens in a new tab).
[7] N. Barman, S. Schmidt, S. Zadtootaghaj, M.G. Martini, “Evaluation of MPEG-5 part 2 (LCEVC) for live gaming video streaming applications”, Proceedings of the Mile-High Video Conference, Mar. 2022. (opens in a new tab).
[8] J. Xu, J. Li, X. Zhou, W. Zhou, B. Wang, Z. Chen, “Perceptual Quality Assessment of Internet Videos”, Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 2021. (opens in a new tab).
[9] F. Götz-Hahn, V. Hosu, H. Lin, D. Saupe, “KonVid-150k: A Dataset for No-Reference Video Quality Assessment of Videos in-the-Wild”, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 72139 – 72160, May. 2021. (opens in a new tab).
[10] L. F. Tiotsop, T. Mizdos, M. Barkowsky, P. Pocta, A. Servetti, E. Masala, “Mimicking Individual Media Quality Perception with Neural Network based Artificial Observers”, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2022. (opens in a new tab).
[11] P. Pérez, J. Ruiz, I. Benito, R. López, “A parametric quality model to evaluate the performance of tele-operated driving services over 5G networks”, Multimedia Tools and Applications, Jul. 2021. (opens in a new tab).

IEC, ISO and ITU issue a call for proposals for joint standardization of image coding based on machine learning

The 94^th JPEG meeting was held online from 17 to 21 January 2022. A major milestone has been reached at this meeting with the release of the final call for proposals under the JPEG AI project. This standard aims at the joint standardization of the first image coding standard based on machine learning by the IEC, ISO and ITU, offering a single stream, compact compressed domain representation, targeting both human visualization with significant compression efficiency improvement over image coding standards in common use at equivalent subjective quality and effective performance for image processing and computer vision tasks.

The JPEG AI call for proposals was issued in parallel with a call for proposals for point cloud coding based on machine learning. The latter will be conducted in parallel with JPEG AI standardization.

The 94^th JPEG meeting had the following highlights:

• JPEG AI Call for Proposals;
• JPEG JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Call for Proposals;
• JPEG Pleno Light Fields quality assessment;
• JPEG AIC near perceptual lossless quality assessment;
• JPEG Systems;
• JPEG Fake Media draft Call for Proposals;
• JPEG NFT exploration;
• JPEG XS;
• JPEG XL
• JPEG DNA explorations.

The following provides an overview of the major achievements carried out during the 94^th JPEG meeting.

JPEG AI

JPEG AI targets a wide range of applications such as cloud storage, visual surveillance, autonomous vehicles and devices, image collection storage and management, live monitoring of visual data and media distribution. The main objective is to design a coding solution that offers significant compression efficiency improvement over coding standards in common use at equivalent subjective quality and an effective compressed domain processing for machine learning-based image processing and computer vision tasks. Other key requirements include hardware/software implementation-friendly encoding and decoding, support for 8- and 10-bit depth, efficient coding of images with text and graphics and progressive decoding.

During the 94^th JPEG meeting, several activities toward a JPEG AI learning-based coding standard have occurred, notably the release of the Final Call for Proposals for JPEG AI, consolidated with the definition of the Use Cases and Requirements and the Common Training and Test Conditions to assure a fair and complete evaluation of the future proposals.

The final JPEG AI Call for Proposals marks an important milestone being the first time that contributions are solicited towards a learning-based image coding solution. The JPEG AI proposals’ registration deadline is 25 February 2022. There are three main phases for proponents to submit materials, namely, on 10^th March for the proposed decoder implementation with some fixed coding model, on 2^nd May for the submission of proposals’ bitstreams and decoded images and/or labels for the test datasets, and on 18^th July, for the submission of source code for the encoder, decoder, training procedure and the proposal description. The presentation and discussion of the JPEG AI proposals will occur during the 96^th JPEG meeting. JPEG AI is a joint standardization project between IEC, ISO and ITU.

JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding

JPEG Pleno is working towards the integration of various modalities of plenoptic content under a single and seamless framework. Efficient and powerful point cloud representation is a key feature of this vision. Point cloud data supports a wide range of applications for human and machine consumption including metaverse, autonomous driving, computer-aided manufacturing, entertainment, cultural heritage preservation, scientific research and advanced sensing and analysis. During the 94^th JPEG meeting, the JPEG Committee released a final Call for Proposals on JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Coding. This call addresses learning-based coding technologies for point cloud content and associated attributes with emphasis on both human visualization and decompressed/reconstructed domain 3D processing and computer vision with competitive compression efficiency compared to point cloud coding standards in common use, with the goal of supporting a royalty-free baseline. This Call was released in conjunction with new releases of the JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Use Cases and Requirements and the JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Common Training and Test Conditions. Interested parties are invited to register for this Call by the deadline of the 31^st of March 2022.

JPEG Pleno Light Field

Besides defining coding standards, JPEG Pleno is planning for the creation of quality assessment standards, i.e. defining a framework including subjective quality assessment protocols and objective quality assessment measures for lossy decoded data of plenoptic modalities in the context of multiple use cases. The first phase of this effort will address the light field modality and should build on the light field quality assessment tools developed by JPEG in recent years. Future activities will focus on holographic and point cloud modalities, for both of which also coding related standardization efforts have been initiated.

JPEG AIC

During the 94^th JPEG Meeting, the first version of the use cases and requirements document was released under the Image Quality Assessment activity. The standardization process was also defined, and the process will be carried out in two phases: during Stage I, a subjective methodology for the assessment of images with visual quality in the range from high quality to near-visually lossless will be standardized, following a collaborative process; successively, in Stage II, an objective image quality metric will be standardized, by means of a competitive process. A tentative timeline has also been planned with a call for contributions for subjective quality assessment methodologies to be released in July 2022, and a call for proposals for an objective quality metric planned in July 2023.

JPEG Systems

JPEG Systems produced the FDIS text for JLINK (ISO/IEC 19566-7), which allows the storage of multiple images inside JPEG files and the interactive navigation between them. This enables features like virtual museum tours, real estate visits, hotspot zoom into other images and many others. For JPEG Snack, the Committee produced the DIS text of ISO/IEC 19566-8, which allows storing multiple images for self-running multimedia experiences like animated image sequences and moving image overlays. Both texts are submitted for respective balloting. For JUMBF (ISO/IEC 19566-5, JPEG Universal Metadata Box Format), a second edition was initiated which combines the first edition and two amendments. Actual extensions are the support of CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) and private content types. In addition, JPEG Systems started an activity on a technical report for JPEG extensions mechanisms to facilitate forwards and backwards compatibility under ISO/IEC 19566-9. This technical report gives guidelines for the design of future JPEG standards and summarizes existing design mechanisms.

JPEG Fake Media

At its 94^th meeting, the JPEG Committee released a Draft Call for Proposals for JPEG Fake Media and associated Use Cases and Requirements on JPEG Fake Media. These documents are the result of the work performed by the JPEG Fake Media exploration. The scope of JPEG Fake Media is the creation of a standard that can facilitate secure and reliable annotation of media asset creation and modifications. The standard shall address use cases that are both in good faith and those with malicious intent. The Committee targets the following timeline for the next steps in the standardization process:

• April 2022: issue Final Call for Proposals
• October 2022: evaluation of proposals
• January 2023: first Working Draft (WD)
• January 2024: Draft International Standard (DIS)
• October 2024: International Standard (IS)

The JPEG Committee welcomes feedback on the JPEG Fake Media documents and invites interested experts to join the JPEG Fake Media AhG mailing list to get involved in this standardization activity.

JPEG NFT

The Ad hoc Group (AhG) on NFT resumed its exploratory work on the role of JPEG in the NFT ecosystem during the 94th JPEG meeting. Three use cases and four essential requirements were selected. The use cases include the usage of NFT for JPEG-based digital art, NFT for collectable JPEGs, and NFT for JPEG micro-licensing. The following categories of critical requirements are under consideration: metadata descriptions, metadata embedding and referencing; authentication and integrity; and the format for registering media assets. As a result, the JPEG Committee published an output document titled JPEG NFT Use Cases and Requirements. Additionally, the third JPEG NFT and Fake Media Workshop proceedings were published, and arrangements were made to hold another combined workshop between the JPEG NFT and JPEG Fake Media groups.

JPEG XS

At the 94^th JPEG meeting a new revision of the Use Cases and Requirements for JPEG XS document was produced, as version 3.1, to clarify and improve the requirements of a frame buffer. In addition, the JPEG Committee reports that the second editions of Part 1 (Core coding system), Part 2 (Profiles and buffer models), and Part 3 (Transport and container formats) have been approved and are now scheduled for publication as International Standards. Lastly, the DAM text for Amendment 1 to JPEG XS Part 2, which contains the additional High420.12 profile and a new sublevel at 4 bpp, is ready and will be sent to final balloting for approval.

JPEG XL

JPEG XL Part 4 (Reference software) has proceeded to the FDIS stage. Work continued on the second edition of Part 1 (Core coding system). Core experiments were defined to investigate the numerical stability of the edge-preserving filter and fixed-point implementations. Both Part 1 (core coding system) and Part 2 (file format) are now published as IS, and preliminary support has been implemented in major web browsers, image viewing and editing software. Consequently, JPEG XL is now ready for wide-scale adoption.

JPEG DNA

The JPEG Committee has continued its exploration of the coding of images in quaternary representations, as is particularly suitable for DNA storage. The scope of JPEG DNA is the creation of a standard for efficient coding of images that considers biochemical constraints and offers robustness to noise introduced by the different stages of the storage process that is based on DNA synthetic polymers. A new version of the JPEG DNA overview document was issued and is now publicly available. It was decided to continue this exploration by validating and extending the JPEG DNA experimentation software to simulate an end-to-end image storage pipeline using DNA for future exploration experiments including biochemical noise simulation. During the 94th JPEG meeting, the JPEG DNA committee initiate a new document describing the Common Test Conditions that should be used to evaluate different aspects of image coding for storage on DNA support. It was also decided to prepare an outreach video to explain DNA coding as well as organize the 6th workshop on JPEG DNA with emphasis on the biochemical process noise simulators. Interested parties are invited to consider joining the effort by registering on the mailing list of JPEG DNA AhG.

Final Quote

“JPEG marks a historical milestone with the parallel release of two calls for proposals for learning based coding of images and point clouds,” said Prof. Touradj Ebrahimi, the Convenor of the JPEG Committee.

Upcoming JPEG meetings are planned as follows:

• No 95, will be held online during 25-29 April 2022

The original blog post can be found at the Bitmovin Techblog and has been modified/updated here to focus on and highlight research aspects.

The 137th MPEG meeting was once again held as an online meeting, and the official press release can be found here and comprises the following items:

• MPEG Systems Wins Two More Technology & Engineering Emmy® Awards
• MPEG Audio Coding selects 6DoF Technology for MPEG-I Immersive Audio
• MPEG Requirements issues Call for Proposals for Encoder and Packager Synchronization
• MPEG Systems promotes MPEG-I Scene Description to the Final Stage
• MPEG Systems promotes Smart Contracts for Media to the Final Stage
• MPEG Systems further enhanced the ISOBMFF Standard
• MPEG Video Coding completes Conformance and Reference Software for LCEVC
• MPEG Video Coding issues Committee Draft of Conformance and Reference Software for MPEG Immersive Video
• JVET produces Second Editions of VVC & VSEI and finalizes VVC Reference Software
• JVET promotes Tenth Edition of AVC to Final Draft International Standard
• JVET extends HEVC for High-Capability Applications up to 16K and Beyond
• MPEG Genomic Coding evaluated Responses on New Advanced Genomics Features and Technologies
• MPEG White Papers
  • Neural Network Coding (NNC)
  • Low Complexity Enhancement Video Coding (LCEVC)
  • MPEG Immersive video

In this column, I’d like to focus on the Emmy® Awards, video coding updates (AVC, HEVC, VVC, and beyond), and a brief update about DASH (as usual).

MPEG Systems Wins Two More Technology & Engineering Emmy® Awards

MPEG Systems is pleased to report that MPEG is being recognized this year by the National Academy for Television Arts and Sciences (NATAS) with two Technology & Engineering Emmy® Awards, for (i) “standardization of font technology for custom downloadable fonts and typography for Web and TV devices and for (ii) “standardization of HTTP encapsulated protocols”, respectively.

The first of these Emmys is related to MPEG’s Open Font Format (ISO/IEC 14496-22) and the second of these Emmys is related to MPEG Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (i.e., MPEG DASH, ISO/IEC 23009). The MPEG DASH standard is the only commercially deployed international standard technology for media streaming over HTTP and it is widely used in many products. MPEG developed the first edition of the DASH standard in 2012 in collaboration with 3GPP and since then has produced four more editions amending the core specification by adding new features and extended functionality. Furthermore, MPEG has developed six other standards as additional “parts” of ISO/IEC 23009 enabling the effective use of the MPEG DASH standards with reference software and conformance testing tools, guidelines, and enhancements for additional deployment scenarios. MPEG DASH has dramatically changed the streaming industry by providing a standard that is widely adopted by various consortia such as 3GPP, ATSC, DVB, and HbbTV, and across different sectors. The success of this standard is due to its technical excellence, large participation of the industry in its development, addressing the market needs, and working with all sectors of industry all under ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29 MPEG Systems’ standard development practices and leadership.

These are MPEG’s fifth and sixth Technology & Engineering Emmy® Awards (after MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 together with JPEG in 1996, Advanced Video Coding (AVC) in 2008, MPEG-2 Transport Stream in 2013, and ISO Base Media File Format in 2021) and MPEG’s seventh and eighth overall Emmy® Awards (including the Primetime Engineering Emmy® Awards for Advanced Video Coding (AVC) High Profile in 2008 and High-Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) in 2017).

I have been actively contributing to the MPEG DASH standard since its inception. My initial blog post dates back to 2010 and the first edition of MPEG DASH was published in 2012. A more detailed MPEG DASH timeline provides many pointers to the Institute of Information Technology (ITEC) at the Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt and its DASH activities that is now continued within the Christian Doppler Laboratory ATHENA. In the end, the MPEG DASH community of contributors to and users of the standards can be very proud of this achievement only after 10 years of the first edition being published. Thus, also happy 10th birthday MPEG DASH and what a nice birthday gift.

Video Coding Updates

In terms of video coding, there have been many updates across various standards’ projects at the 137th MPEG Meeting.

Advanced Video Coding

Starting with Advanced Video Coding (AVC), the 10th edition of Advanced Video Coding (AVC, ISO/IEC 14496-10 | ITU-T H.264) has been promoted to Final Draft International Standard (FDIS) which is the final stage of the standardization process. Beyond various text improvements, this specifies a new SEI message for describing the shutter interval applied during video capture. This can be variable in video cameras, and conveying this information can be valuable for analysis and post-processing of the decoded video.

High-Efficiency Video Coding

The High-Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC, ISO/IEC 23008-2 | ITU-T H.265) standard has been extended to support high-capability applications. It defines new levels and tiers providing support for very high bit rates and video resolutions up to 16K, as well as defining an unconstrained level. This will enable the usage of HEVC in new application domains, including professional, scientific, and medical video sectors.

Versatile Video Coding

The second editions of Versatile Video Coding (VVC, ISO/IEC 23090-3 | ITU-T H.266) and Versatile supplemental enhancement information messages for coded video bitstreams (VSEI, ISO/IEC 23002-7 | ITU-T H.274) have reached FDIS status. The new VVC version defines profiles and levels supporting larger bit depths (up to 16 bits), including some low-level coding tool modifications to obtain improved compression efficiency with high bit-depth video at high bit rates. VSEI version 2 adds SEI messages giving additional support for scalability, multi-view, display adaptation, improved stream access, and other use cases. Furthermore, a Committee Draft Amendment (CDAM) for the next amendment of VVC was issued to begin the formal approval process to enable linking VVC with the Green Metadata (ISO/IEC 23001-11) and Video Decoding Interface (ISO/IEC 23090-13) standards and add a new unconstrained level for exceptionally high capability applications such as certain uses in professional, scientific, and medical application scenarios. Finally, the reference software package for VVC (ISO/IEC 23090-16) was also completed with its achievement of FDIS status. Reference software is extremely helpful for developers of VVC devices, helping them in testing their implementations for conformance to the video coding specification.

Beyond VVC

The activities in terms of video coding beyond VVC capabilities, the Enhanced Compression Model (ECM 3.1) performance over VTM-11.0 + JVET-V0056 (i.e., VVC reference software) shows an improvement of close to 15% for Random Access Main 10. This is indeed encouraging and, in general, these activities are currently managed within two exploration experiments (EEs). The first is on neural network-based (NN) video coding technology (EE1) and the second is on enhanced compression beyond VVC capability (EE2). EE1 currently plans to further investigate (i) enhancement filters (loop and post) and (ii) super-resolution (JVET-Y2023). It will further investigate selected NN technologies on top of ECM 4 and the implementation of selected NN technologies in the software library, for platform-independent cross-checking and integerization. Enhanced Compression Model 4 (ECM 4) comprises new elements on MRL for intra, various GPM/affine/MV-coding improvements including TM, adaptive intra MTS, coefficient sign prediction, CCSAO improvements, bug fixes, and encoder improvements (JVET-Y2025). EE2 will investigate intra prediction improvements, inter prediction improvements, improved screen content tools, and improved entropy coding (JVET-Y2024).

Research aspects: video coding performance is usually assessed in terms of compression efficiency or/and encoding runtime (time complexity). Another aspect is related to visual quality, its assessment, and metrics, specifically for neural network-based video coding technologies.

The latest MPEG-DASH Update

Finally, I’d like to provide a brief update on MPEG-DASH! At the 137th MPEG meeting, MPEG Systems issued a draft amendment to the core MPEG-DASH specification (i.e., ISO/IEC 23009-1) about Extended Dependent Random Access Point (EDRAP) streaming and other extensions which it will be further discussed during the Ad-hoc Group (AhG) period (please join the dash email list for further details/announcements). Furthermore, Defects under Investigation (DuI) and Technologies under Consideration (TuC) are available here.

An updated overview of DASH standards/features can be found in the Figure below.

Research aspects: in the Christian Doppler Laboratory ATHENA we aim to research and develop novel paradigms, approaches, (prototype) tools and evaluation results for the phases (i) multimedia content provisioning (i.e., video coding), (ii) content delivery (i.e., video networking), and (iii) content consumption (i.e., video player incl. ABR and QoE) in the media delivery chain as well as for (iv) end-to-end aspects, with a focus on, but not being limited to, HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS).

The 138th MPEG meeting will be again an online meeting in July 2022. Click here for more information about MPEG meetings and their developments.