VQEG Column: VQEG Meeting May 2025

Introduction

From May 5th to 9th, 2025 Meta hosted the plenary meeting of the Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG) in their headquarters in Menlo Park (CA, United Sates). Around 150 participants registered to the meeting, coming from industry and academic institutions from 26 different countries worldwide.

The meeting was dedicated to present updates and discuss about topics related to the ongoing projects within VQEG. All the related information, minutes, and files from the meeting are available online in the VQEG meeting website, and video recordings of the meeting are available in Youtube.

All the topics mentioned bellow can be of interest for the SIGMM community working on quality assessment, but special attention can be devoted to the first activities of the group on Subjective and objective assessment of GenAI content (SOGAI) and to the advances on the contribution of the Immersive Media Group (IMG) group to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) towards the Rec. ITU-T P.IXC for the evaluation of Quality of Experience (QoE) of immersive interactive communication systems.

Readers of these columns who are interested in VQEG’s ongoing projects are encouraged to subscribe to the corresponding mailing lists to stay informed and get involved.

Group picture of the meeting

Overview of VQEG Projects

Immersive Media Group (IMG)

The IMG group researches on the quality assessment of immersive media technologies. Currently, the main joint activity of the group is the development of a test plan to evaluate the QoE of immersive interactive communication systems, which is carried out in collaboration with ITU-T through the work item P.IXC. In this meeting, Pablo Pérez (Nokia XR Lab, Spain), Marta Orduna (Nokia XR Lab, Spain), and Jesús Gutiérrez (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain) presented the status of this recommendation and the next steps to be addressed towards a new contribution to ITU-T in its next meeting in September 2025. Also, in this meeting, it was decided that Marta Orduna will replace Pablo Pérez as vice-chair of IMG. In addition, the following presentations related to IMG topics were delivered:

Statistical Analysis Methods (SAM)

The SAM group investigates on analysis methods both for the results of subjective experiments and for objective quality models and metrics. In relation with these topics, the following presentations were delivered during the meeting:

Joint Effort Group (JEG) – Hybrid

The group JEG addresses several areas of Video Quality Assessment (VQA), such as the creation of a large dataset for training such models using full-reference metrics instead of subjective metrics. The chair of this group, Enrico Masala (Politecnico di Torino, Italy) presented the updates on the latest activities of the group, including the current results of the Implementer’s Guide for Video Quality Metrics (IGVQM) project. In addition to this, the following presentations were delivered:

Emerging Technologies Group (ETG)

The ETG group focuses on various aspects of multimedia that, although they are not necessarily directly related to “video quality”, can indirectly impact the work carried out within VQEG and are not addressed by any of the existing VQEG groups. In particular, this group aims to provide a common platform for people to gather together and discuss new emerging topics, possible collaborations in the form of joint survey papers, funding proposals, etc. In this sense, the following topics were presented and discussed in the meeting:

  • Avinab Saha (UT Austin, United States) presented the dataset of perceived expression differences, FaceExpressions-70k, which contains 70,500 subjective expression comparisons rated by over 1,000 study participants obtained via crowdsourcing.
  • Mathias Wien (RWTH Aachen University, Germany) reported on recent developments in MPEG AG 5 and JVET for preparations towards a Call for Evidence (CfE) on video compression with capability beyond VVC.
  • Effrosyni Doutsi (Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, Greece) presented her research on novel evaluation frameworks for spike-based compression mechanisms.
  • David Ronca (Meta Platforms Inc. United States) presented the Video Codec Acid Test (VCAT), which is a benchmarking tool for hardware and software decoders on Android devices.

Subjective and objective assessment of GenAI content (SOGAI)

The SOGAI group seeks to standardize both subjective testing methodologies and objective metrics for assessing the quality of GenAI-generated content. In this first meeting of the group since its foundation, the following topics were presented and discussed:

  • Ryan Lei and Qi Cai (Meta Platforms Inc., United states) presented their work on learning from subjective evaluation of Super Resolution (SR) in production use cases at scale, which included extensive benchmarking tests and subjective evaluation with external crowdsource vendors.
  • Ioannis Katsavounidis, Qi Cai, Elias Kokkinis, Shankar Regunathan (Meta Platforms Inc., United States) presented their work on learning from synergistic subjective/objective evaluation of auto dubbing in production use cases.
  • Kamil Koniuch (AGH University of Krakow, Poland) presented his research on cognitive perspective on Absolute Category Rating (ACR) scale tests
  • Patrick Le Callet (Nantes Universite, France) presented his work, in collaboration with researchers from SJTU (China) on perceptual quality assessment of AI-generated omnidirectional images, including the annotated dataset called AIGCOIQA2024.

Multimedia Experience and Human Factors (MEHF)

The MEHF group focuses on the human factors influencing audiovisual and multimedia experiences, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of how human factors impact the perceived quality of multimedia content. In this meeting, the following presentations were given:

5G Key Performance Indicators (5GKPI)

The 5GKPI group studies the relationship between key performance indicators of new 5G networks and QoE of video services on top of them. In this meeting, Pablo Pérez (Nokia XR Lab, Spain) and the rest of the team presented a first draft of the VQEG Whitepaper on QoE management in telecommunication networks, which shares insights and recommendations on actionable controls and performance metrics that the Content Application Providers (CAPs) and Network Service Providers (NSPs) can use to infer, measure and manage QoE.

In addition, Pablo Perez (Nokia XR Lab, Spain), Marta Orduna (Nokia XR Lab, Spain), and Kamil Koniuch (AGH University of Krakow, Poland) presented design guidelines and a proposal of a simple but practical QoE model for communication networks, with a focus on 5G/6G compatibility.

Quality Assessment for Health Applications (QAH)

The QAH group is focused on the quality assessment of health applications. It addresses subjective evaluation, generation of datasets, development of objective metrics, and task-based approaches. In this meeting, Lumi Xia (INSA Rennes, France) presented her research on task-based medical image quality assessment by numerical observer.

Other updates

Apart from this, Ajit Ninan (Meta Platforms Inc., United States) delivered a keynote on rethinking visual quality for perceptual display; a panel was organized with Christos Bampis (Netflix, United States), Denise Noyes (Meta Platforms Inc., United States), and Yilin Wang (Google, United States) addressing what more is left to do on optimizing video quality for adaptive streaming applications, which was moderated by Narciso García (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain); and there was a co-located ITU-T Q19 interim meeting. In addition, although no progresses were presented in this meeting, the groups on No Reference Metrics (NORM) and on Quality Assessment for Computer Vision Applications (QACoViA) are still active.  

Finally, as already announced in the VQEG website, the next VQEG plenary meeting will be online or hybrid online/in-person, probably in November or December 2025.

Students Report from ACM MMsys 2025

The 16th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (with the associated workshops: NOSSDAV 2025 and MMVE 2025) was held from March 31st to April 4th 2025, in Stellenbosch, South Africa. By choosing this location, the steering committee marked a milestone for SIGMM: MMSys became the very first SIGMM conference to take place on the African continent. This perfectly aligns with the SIGMM ongoing mission to build an inclusive and globally representative multimedia‑systems community.

The MMSys conference brings together researchers in multimedia systems to showcase and exchange their cutting-edge research findings. Once again, there were technical talks spanning various multimedia domains and inspiring keynote presentations.

Recognising the importance of in‑person exchange—especially for early‑career researchers—SIGMM once again funded Student Travel Grants. This support enabled a group of doctoral students to attend the conference, present their work and start building their international peer networks.
In this column, the recipients of the travel grants share their experiences at MMSys 2025.

Guodong Chen – PhD student, Northeastern University, USA 

What an incredible experience attending ACM MMSys 2025 in South Africa! Huge thanks to SIGMM for the travel grant that made this possible. 

It was an honour to present our paper, “TVMC: Time-Varying Mesh Compression Using Volume-Tracked Reference Meshes”, and I’m so happy that it received the Best Reproducible Paper Award! 

MMSys is not that huge, but it’s truly great. It’s exceptionally well-organized, and what impressed me the most was the openness and enthusiasm of the community. Everyone is eager to communicate, exchange ideas, and dive deep into cutting-edge multimedia systems research. I made many new friends and discovered exciting overlaps between my research and the work of other groups. I believe many collaborations are on the way and that, to me, is the true mark of a successful conference. 

Besides the conference, South Africa was amazing, don’t miss the wonderful wines of Stellenbosch and the unforgettable experience of a safari tour. 

Lea Brzica – PhD student, University of Zagreb, Croatia

Attending MMSys’25 in Stellenbosch, South Africa was an unforgettable and inspiring experience. As a new PhD student and early-career researcher, this was not only my first in-person conference but also my first time presenting. I was honoured to share my work, “Analysis of User Experience and Task Performance in a Multi-User Cross-Reality Virtual Object Manipulation Task,” and excited to see genuine interest from other attendees.
Beyond the workshop and technical sessions, I thoroughly enjoyed the keynotes and panel discussions. The poster sessions and demos were great opportunities to explore new ideas and engage with people from all over the world.
One of the most meaningful aspects of the conference was the opportunity to meet fellow PhD students and researchers face-to-face. The coffee breaks and social activities created a welcoming atmosphere that made it easy to form new connections.

I am truly grateful to SIGMM for supporting my participation. The travel grant helped alleviate the financial burden of international travel and made this experience possible. I’m already hoping for the chance to come back and be part of it all over again!

Jérémy Ouellette – PhD student Concordia University, Canada

My time at MMSys 2025 was an incredibly rewarding experience. It was great meeting so many interesting and passionate people in the field, and the reception was both enthusiastic and exceptionally well organized. I want to sincerely thank SIGMM for the travel grant, as their support made it possible for me to attend and present my work. South Africa was an amazing destination, and the entire experience was both professionally and personally unforgettable. MMSys was also the perfect environment for networking, offering countless opportunities to connect with researchers and industry experts. It was truly exciting to see so much interest in my work and to engage in meaningful conversations with others in the multimedia systems community.

The 3rd Edition of Spring School on Social XR organised by CWI

The 3rd edition of the Spring School on Social XR organised by Distributed and Interactive Systems group (DIS) at CWI in Amsterdam took place from 7 to 10 April 2025. The event attracted 30 students from different disciplines (technology, social sciences, and humanities) and countries from the world (Europe but also Canada and USA). The event was organized by Silvia Rossi, Irene Viola, Thomas Röggla, and Pablo Cesar from CWI; and Omar Niamut from TNO. Also this year, it was co-sponsored by ACM SIGMM, thanks to the founding for Special initiatives, and for the first time has been recognised as an ACM Europe Council Seasonal School.

Students and organisers of the 3rd Spring School on Social XR

Across 9 lectures (4 of them open to public) and three hands‑on workshops led by 14 international instructors, participants had the possibility to have cross-domain interactions on Social XR. Sessions ranged from photorealistic avatar capture and behaviour modelling, through AI‑driven volumetric‑video production, low‑latency streaming and novel rendering techniques, to rigorous QoE evaluation frameworks and open immersive‑media datasets. A new thematic topic this year tackled the privacy, security and UX challenges that arise when immersive systems move from lab prototypes to real‑world communication platforms. Together, they provided a holistic perspective, helping participants to better understand the area and to initiate a network of collaboration to overcome current limitations of current real-time conferencing systems. A unique feature of the school is its Open Days, where selected keynotes are made publicly accessible both in person and via live streaming, ensuring broader engagement with the XR research community. In addition to theoretical and hands-on sessions, the school supports networking and discussions through dedicated events, including a poster presentation where participants can receive feedback from peers and experts in the field of Social XR. 

Students during a boat trip.

The list of talks were: 

  • “The Multiple Dimensions of Social in Social XR” by Sun Joo (Grace) Ahn (University of Georgia, USA) 
  • “Shaping VR Experiences: Designing Applications and Experiences for Quality of Experience Assessment” by Marco Carli (Universitá degli Studi Roma TRE, Italy) 
  • “Making a Virtual Reality” by Elmar Eisemann (TU Delft, The Netherlands) 
  • “Robotic Avatar Mediated Social Interaction” by Jan van Erp (TNO & University of Twente, The Netherlands) 
  • “Novel Opportunities and Emerging Risks of Social Virtual Reality Spaces for Online Interactions” by Guo Freeman (Clemson University, USA) 
  • “Privacy, Security and UX Challenges in (Social) XR: an Overview” by Katrien de Moor (NTNU, Norway)
  •  “AI-based Volumetric Content Creation for Immersive XR Experiences and Production Workflows” by Aljosa Smolic (Hochschule Luzern, Switzerland)
  • “Changing Habits, One Experience at a Time” by Funda Yildirim (University of Twente, The Netherlands) 
  • “Challenge-Driven Quality Evaluation and Dataset Development for Immersive Visual Experiences” by Emin Zerman (Mid Sweden University, Sweden) 

The list of Workshops were: 

  • “Cooperative Development of Social XR Evaluation Methods” by Jesús Gutiérrez (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain) and Pablo Pérez (Nokia XR Labs, Spain) 
  • “From Principle to Practice: Public Values in Action” by Mariëtte van Huijstee (Rathenau Institute, The Netherlands) and Paulien Dresscher (PublicSpaces, The Netherlands) 
  • “Interoperability: What is a Visual Positioning System and Why an Open Source One and Interoperability Between These Systems Need to be Established” by Alina Kadlubsky (Open AR Cloud Europe, Germany)

JPEG Column: 107th JPEG Meeting in Brussels, Belgium

JPEG assesses responses to its Call for Proposals on Lossless Coding of Visual Events

The 107th JPEG meeting was held in Brussels, Belgium, from April 12 to 18, 2025. During this meeting, the JPEG Committee assessed the responses to its call for proposals on JPEG XE, an International Standard for lossless coding of visual events. JPEG XE is being developed under the auspices of three major standardisation organisations: ISO, IEC, and ITU. It will be the first codec developed by the JPEG committee targeting lossless representation and coding of visual events.

The JPEG Committee is also working on various standardisation projects, such as JPEG AI, which uses learning technology to achieve high compression, JPEG Trust, which sets standards to combat fake media and misinformation while rebuilding trust in multimedia, and JPEG DNA, which represents digital images using DNA sequences for long-term storage.

The following sections summarise the main highlights of the 107th JPEG meeting:

  • JPEG XE
  • JPEG AI
  • JPEG Trust
  • JPEG AIC
  • JPEG Pleno
  • JPEG DNA
  • JPEG XS
  • JPEG RF

JPEG XE

This initiative focuses on a new imaging modality produced by event-based visual sensors. This effort aims to establish a standard that efficiently represents and codes events, thereby enhancing interoperability in sensing, storage, and processing for machine vision and related applications.

As a response to the JPEG XE Final Call for Proposals on lossless coding of events, the JPEG Committee received five innovative proposals for consideration. Their evaluation indicated that two among them meet the stringent requirements of the constrained case, where resources, power, and complexity are severely limited. The remaining three proposals can cater to the unconstrained case. During the 107th JPEG meeting, the JPEG Committee launched a series of Core Experiments to define a path forward based on the received proposals as a starting point for the development of the JPEG XE standard.

To streamline the standardisation process, the JPEG Committee will proceed with the JPEG XE initiative in three distinct phases. Phase 1 will concentrate on lossless coding for the constrained case, while Phase 2 will address the unconstrained case. Both phases will commence simultaneously, although Phase 1 will follow a faster timeline to enable a timely publication of the first edition of the standard. The JPEG Committee recognises the urgent industry demand for a standardised solution for the constrained case, aiming to produce a Committee Draft by as early as July 2025. The third phase will focus on lossy compression of event sequences. The discussions and preparations will be initiated soon.

In a significant collaborative effort between ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG1 and ITU-T SG21, the JPEG Committee will proceed to specify a joint JPEG XE standard. This partnership will ensure that JPEG XE becomes a shared standard under ISO, IEC, and ITU-T, reflecting their mutual commitment to developing standards for event-based systems.

Additionally, the JPEG Committee is actively discussing and exploring lossy coding of visual events, exploring future evaluation methods for such advanced technologies. Stakeholders interested in JPEG XE are encouraged to access public documents available at jpeg.org. Moreover, a joint Ad-hoc Group on event-based vision has been formed between ITU-T Q7/21 and ISO/IEC JTC1 SC29/WG1, paving the way for continued collaboration leading up to the 108th JPEG meeting.

JPEG AI

At the 107th JPEG meeting, JPEG AI discussions focused around conformance (JPEG AI Part 4), which has now advanced to the Draft International Standard (DIS) stage. The specification defines three conformance points — namely, the decoded residual tensor, the decoded latent space tensor (also referred to as feature space), and the decoded image. Strict conformance for the residual tensor is evaluated immediately after entropy decoding, while soft conformance for the latent space tensor is assessed after tensor decoding. The decoded image conformance is measured after converting the image to the output picture format, but before any post-processing filters are applied. Regarding the decoded image, two types have been defined: conformance Type A, which implies low tolerance, and conformance Type B, which allows for moderate tolerance.

During the 107th JPEG meeting, the results of several subjective quality assessment experiments were also presented and discussed, using different methodologies and for different test conditions, from low to very high qualities, including both SDR and HDR images. The results of these evaluations have shown that JPEG AI is highly competitive and, in many cases, outperforms existing state-of-the-art codecs such as VVC Intra, AVIF, and JPEG XL. A demonstration of an JPEG AI encoder running on a Huawei Mate50 Pro smartphone with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 chipset was also presented. This implementation supports tiling, high-resolution (4K) support, and a base profile with level 20. Finally, the implementation status of all mandatory and desirable JPEG AI requirements was discussed, assessing whether each requirement had been fully met, partially addressed, or remained unaddressed. This helped to clarify the current maturity of the standard and identify areas for further refinements.

JPEG Trust

Building on the publication of JPEG Trust (ISO/IEC 21617) Part 1 – Core Foundation in January 2025, the JPEG Committee approved a Draft International Standard (DIS) for a 2nd edition of Part 1 – Core Foundation during the 107th JPEG meeting. This Part 1 – Core Foundation 2nd edition incorporates the signalling of identity and intellectual property rights to address three particular challenges:

  • achieving transparency, through the signaling of content provenance
  • identifying content that has been generated either by humans, machines or AI systems, and
  • enabling interoperability, for example, by standardising machine-readable terms of use of intellectual property, especially AI-related rights reservations.

Additionally, the JPEG Committee is currently developing Part 2 – Trust Profiles Catalogue. Part 2 provides a catalogue of trust profile snippets that can be used either on their own or in combination for the purpose of constructing trust profiles, which can then be used for assessing the trustworthiness of media assets in given usage scenarios. The Trust Profiles Catalogue also defines a collection of conformance points, which enables interoperability across usage scenarios through the use of associated trust profiles.

The Committee continues to develop JPEG Trust Part 3 – Media asset watermarking to build out additional requirements for identified use cases, including the emerging need to identify AIGC content.

Finally, during the 107th meeting, the JPEG Committee initiated a Part 4 – Reference software, which will provide reference implementations of JPEG Trust to which implementers can refer to in developing trust solutions based on the JPEG Trust framework.

JPEG AIC

The JPEG AIC Part 3 standard (ISO/IEC CD 29170-3), has received a revised title “Information technology — JPEG AIC Assessment of image coding — Part 3: Subjective quality assessment of high-fidelity images”. At the 107th JPEG meeting, the results of the last Core Experiments for the standard and the comments on the Committee Draft of the standard were addressed. The draft text was thoroughly revised and clarified, and has now advanced to the Draft International Standard (DIS) stage.

Furthermore, Part 4 of JPEG AIC deals with objective quality metrics, also of high-fidelity images, and at the 107th JPEG meeting, the technical details regarding anchor metrics as well as the testing and evaluation of proposed methods were discussed and finalised. The results have been compiled in the document “Common Test Conditions on Objective Image Quality Assessment”, available on the JPEG website. Moreover, the corresponding Final Call for Proposals on Objective Image Quality Assessment (AIC-4) has been issued. Proposals are expected at the end of Summer 2025. The first Working Draft for Objective Image Quality Assessment (AIC-4) is planned for April 2026.

JPEG Pleno

The JPEG Pleno Light Field activity discussed the DoCR for the submitted Committee Draft (CD) of the 2nd edition of ISO/IEC 21794-2 (“Plenoptic image coding system (JPEG Pleno) Part 2: Light field coding”). This 2nd edition integrates AMD1 of ISO/IEC 21794-2 (“Profiles and levels for JPEG Pleno Light Field Coding”) and includes the specification of a third coding mode entitled Slanted 4D Transform Mode and its associated profile. It is expected that at the 108th JPEG meeting this new edition will advance to the Draft International Standard (DIS) stage.

Software tools have been created and tested to be added as Common Test Condition Tools to a reference software implementation for the standardized technologies within the JPEG Pleno framework, including the JPEG Pleno Part 2 (ISO/IEC 21794-2).

In the framework of the ongoing standardisation effort on quality assessment methodologies for light fields, significant progress was achieved during the 107th JPEG meeting. The JPEG Committee finalised the Committee Draft (CD) of the forthcoming standard ISO/IEC 21794-7 entitled JPEG Pleno Quality Assessment – Light Fields, representing an important step toward the establishment of reliable tools for evaluating the perceptual quality of light fields. This CD incorporates recent refinements to the subjective light field assessment framework and integrates insights from the latest core experiments.

The Committee also approved the Final Call for Proposals (CfP) on Objective Metrics for JPEG Pleno Quality Assessment – Light Fields. This initiative invites proposals of novel objective metrics capable of accurately predicting perceived quality of compressed light field content. The detailed submission timeline and required proposal components are outlined in the released final CfP document. To support this process, updated versions of the Use Cases and Requirements (v6.0) and Common Test Conditions (v2.0) related to this CfP were reviewed and made available. Moreover, several task forces have been established to address key proposal elements, including dataset preparation, codec configuration, objective metric evaluation, and the subjective experiments.

At this meeting, ISO/IEC 21794-6 (“Plenoptic image coding system (JPEG Pleno) Part 6: Learning-based point cloud coding”) progressed to the balloting of the Final Draft International Standard (FDIS) stage. Balloting will end on the 12th of June 2025 with the publication of the International Standard expected for August 2025.

The JPEG Committee held a workshop on Future Challenges in Compression of Holograms for XR Applications organised on April 16th, covering major applications from holographic cameras to holographic displays. The 2nd workshop for Future Challenges in Compression of Holograms for Metrology Applications is planned for July.

JPEG DNA

The JPEG Committee continues to develop JPEG DNA, an ambitious initiative to standardize the representation of digital images using DNA sequences for long-term storage. Following a Call for Proposals launched at its 99th JPEG meeting, a Verification Model was established during the 102nd JPEG meeting, then refined through core experiments that led to the first Working Draft at the 103rd JPEG meeting.

New JPEG DNA logo.

At its 105th JPEG meeting, JPEG DNA was officially approved as a new ISO/IEC project (ISO/IEC 25508), structured into four parts: Core Coding System, Profiles and Levels, Reference Software, and Conformance. The Committee Draft (CD) of Part 1 was produced at the 106th JPEG meeting.

During the 107th JPEG meeting, the JPEG Committee reviewed the comments received on the CD of JPEG DNA standard and prepared a Disposition of Comments Report (DoCR). The goal remains to reach International Standard (IS) status for Part 1 by April 2026.

On this occasion, the official JPEG DNA logo was also unveiled, marking a new milestone in the visibility and identity of the project.

JPEG XS

The development of the third edition of the JPEG XS standard is nearing its final stages, marking significant progress for the standardisation of high-performance video coding. Notably, Part 4, focusing on conformance testing, has been officially accepted by ISO and IEC for publication. Meanwhile, Part 5, which provides reference software, is presently at Draft International Standard (DIS) ballot stage.

In a move that underscores the commitment to accessibility and innovation in media technology, both Part 4 and Part 5 will be made publicly available as free standards. This decision is expected to facilitate widespread adoption and integration of JPEG XS in relevant industries and applications.

Looking to the future, the JPEG Committee is exploring enhancements to the JPEG XS standard, particularly in supporting a master-proxy stream feature. This feature enables a high-fidelity master video stream to be accompanied by a lower-resolution proxy stream, ensuring minimal overhead. Such functionalities are crucial in optimising broadcast and content production workflows.

JPEG RF

The JPEG RF activity issued the proceedings of the Joint JPEG/MPEG Workshop on Radiance Fields which was held on the 31st of January and featured world-renowned speakers discussing Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) from the perspective of both academia, industry, and standardisation groups. Video recordings and all related material were made publicly available on the JPEG website. Moreover, an improved version of the JPEG RF State of the Art and Challenges document was proposed, including an updated review of coding techniques for radiance fields as well as newly identified use cases and requirements. The group also defined an exploration study to investigate protocols for subjective and objective quality assessment, which are considered to be crucial to advance this activity towards a coding standard for radiance fields.

Final Quote

“A cost-effective and interoperable event-based vision ecosystem requires an efficient coding standard. The JPEG Committee embraces this new challenge by initiating a new standardisation project to achieve this objective.” said Prof. Touradj Ebrahimi, the Convenor of the JPEG Committee.

Diversity and Inclusion at ACM MMSys 2025

The 16th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference and its associated workshops (MMVE 2025 and NOSSDAV’25) were held from March 31st to April 4th 2025, in Stellenbosch, South Africa. With the intention to create a diverse and inclusive community for multimedia systems, several activities were followed. In this column, we provide a brief overview of different Diversity and Inclusion activities taken before and during the 16th ACM MMSys’25.

Activities Before the Conference

Grants

Thanks to the generous support from the ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia (SIGMM), we could provide some grants:

  • Student Travel Grant: ACM SIGMM offered travel grants for students in order to promote participation and diversity of students in the conference. ACM SIGMM has centralised support for standard student travel for in-person participation, and any student member of SIGMM, and those who were the first author of an accepted paper, were eligible and encouraged to apply. Female and minority students’ applications were also encouraged.
  • Young African Researcher Travel Awards: Travel grants were awarded specifically aimed to support young African researchers to attend the ACM MMSys’25 Conference and its co-located workshops. These awards targeted to foster diversity, promote knowledge exchange, and strengthen the multimedia systems research community across Africa. One of the eligibility criteria was to be affiliated with an African institution or to be an enrolled PhD student at an African higher learning institution.

Diversity in Papers

Previous to the conference, a brief analysis was done to understand how diverse and inclusive are the submitted papers. During the review process, paper reviewers indicated weather a paper tackled any aspect of diversity and inclusion by considering the following diversity criteria:

  1. Scope
  2. Approach
  3. Evaluation procedure
  4. Results
  5. Other
  6. This paper does not address any topics of diversity

It was found that the majority of papers did not address any topic of diversity, as shown in the diagram below. With these results in mind, we decided to organise a pabel about how to increase diversity and inclusion in future submissions to the conference.

Activities at the Conference: The Diversity Panel

Fuelled by the results of the study about diversity in MMSys’25 papers, the conference featured a panel discussion with the purpose to understand how diverse and inclusive are the topics, methodologies and evaluations in the papers submitted to the conference. In particular, the topics of discussion were (i) Implementing Diversity and Inclusion in research; (ii) Challenges in implementing Diversity and Inclusion; (iii) Inclusive and Diverse Practices; and (iv) Monitoring implementation progress.

Diversity and Inclusion panel discussion in this context targeted to explore how researchers/academia accommodate or work together with their relevant stakeholders or communities during their research activities, and during results dissemination such as in conferences.

To enable the discussion, we invited 4 panellists with different expertise both from academia and industry. These were: 


Professor Vali Lalioti
University of the Arts London (United Kingdom)
Vali Lalioti is a pioneering designer, computer scientist, and innovator. She is Professor of Creative XR and Robotics and Director of Programmes at the Creative Computing Institute (CCI), University of the Arts London (UAL). She played a key role in developing the world’s first Virtual Reality (VR) systems in Germany. Her research focuses on human-robot interaction, robotic movement design, and XR for societal impact, spanning well-being, healthy aging, performance art, and the future of work. She pioneered BBC’s first Augmented Reality production (2003). As Founder-Director at CCI, she founded the Creative XR and Robotics Research Hub, that led the Institute’s expansion.

Associate Professor. Ketan Mayer-Patel
 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ketan Mayer-Patel is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of North Carolina. His research generally focuses on multimedia systems, networking, and multicast applications. Currently, he is investigating model-based video coding, dynamic media coding models, and networking problems associated with multiple independent, but semantically related, media streams.

Dr. Marta Orduna 
Nokia XR Lab; Madrid,Spain
Marta Orduna is a Telecommunication Engineer, Bachelor of Engineering in Telecommunication Technologies and Services in 2016 and Master in Telecommunication Engineering in 2018 both from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM). In 2023, she received her PhD from UPM entitled “Understanding and Assessing Quality of Experience in Immersive Communications”, reaching Cum Laude. In 2023, she joined Nokia Extended Reality Lab team in Spain, where she continues her research line of the PhD in the area of quality of experience in extended reality

Professor Gregor Schiele
University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Gregor Schiele is leading the research lab on Intelligent Embedded Systems at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Professor Gregor’s goal is to make deep learning algorithms so efficient that they can be executed efficiently on every computer device, including tiny embedded sensors and wearable XR devices. He is a big fan of the MMSys community and its constructive discussion culture. 

Below, we provide a summary of the main findings on the four presented topics:

(1) Implementing Diversity and Inclusion in research

The panel discussion revealed that all panellists have worked or collaborated successfully with stakeholders outside their workplaces. Diversity and inclusion were mainly implemented via data collection for research work, co-creation, stakeholders’ workshops or seminars, and in research methodologies such as working with community in participatory action. The discussion highlighted the experience of our panellists with diversity measures as well as helped rising awareness in the audience as to what could they apply as diversity measures to their own work. 

(2) Challenges in implementing the Diversity and Inclusion

The following were mentioned as challenges in implementing diversity and inclusion in research and research dissemination activities:

  1. Financial and time constraints,
  2. Different organizational culture,
  3. Difficulty to find a common time for collaboration due to different priorities,
  4. Differences in language, organizational priorities and objectives.

(3) Inclusive and Diverse Practices

The panel discussed how to build a diverse and an inclusive conference in terms of topics, methodology (variety of approaches in pre-conference, during the conference and post conference). The following are some of the proposed practices:

  1. In a conference, invite at least three best papers and three best demos from other related conferences to present their work and showcase their demos respectively.
  2. Co-location of at least two conferences or workshop with related or complementing themes.
  3. Focus on relevant related conferences to find a match which will lead to run a common workshop, this will build relation that can lead to conferences co-location hence diversity and inclusion.
  4. Invite University graduates employers and   equipment vendors or manufacturers to participate and exhibit their products in conferences.
  5. Provide avenue in conferences for stakeholders to interact with academia such as in roundtable discussion or debates between academia vs industry and keynote presentation from industry/stakeholders.
  6. Run a flagship workshops or conferences with switching roles, for example this year the conference is for academia while industry/stakeholders are invited and assigned minor roles, next year the conference is dominated by industry/stakeholders and academia are invited with minor roles in the conference
  7. Run a conference with tracks of diverse and inclusive themes
  8. In order to accommodate policy makers in conferences, suggestions were as follows:
    1. Invite high profile Government officials such as Ministers or Presidents to officiate or close a conference where they will spend few hours listening to policy brief aligned to the conference theme or to the major conference resolutions during conference opening or closing respectively.
    2. Seek audience with the officials to briefly discuss conference resolutions or issues raised during the conference relevant to their offices.

(4) Monitoring implementation progress

Panellists were required to discuss how to track and measure progress in implementing diversity and inclusion in future ACM MMSys conferences. Generally, this point appeared difficult or it was not well understood by the panellists. It received very few and short responses. Most of the responses were kind of recommendation to:

  1. First set performance criteria which will be used as benchmarks for tracking and measuring implementation progress on diversity and inclusion.
  2. Develop stages of diverse and inclusive such as early/infant stage, medium/growing stage and premium/mature stage to guide a monitoring process, performance parameters and monitoring tools for paper evaluation process and in pre, during and post conference.

Concluding Remarks

Diversity and Inclusion activities done at the ACM MMSys 2025 served as important steps in nurturing diverse and inclusive multimedia system community. The activities comprised of travel grants supporting underrepresented and young African researchers, together with panel discussion at the conference. Although paper review analysis discovered that diversity topics remain underrepresented in paper submissions, this finding served as a catalyst for a rigorous panel discussion, that leads to concrete recommendations.  Going forward, the multimedia systems community is encouraged to adopt a smart framework with progress stages and performance parameters to monitor and track progress of diversity and inclusion in the ACM MMSys conference series.